RBA: A best effort resource allocation algorithm for asynchronous real-time distributed systems

被引:0
作者
Ravindran, B [1 ]
Hegazy, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Bradley Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2001年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
adaptive resource allocation; asynchronous distributed systems; benefit accrual model; best effort scheduling; real-time Ethernet; real-time systems; quality of service;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We present a best effort resource allocation algorithm called RBA for asynchronous realtime distributed systems. The algorithm uses Jensen's benefit functions for expressing application timeliness requirements and proposes adaptation functions to describe the anticipated application workload during future time intervals. Furthermore, RBA considers an adaptation model where subtasks of application tasks may be replicated at run-time for sharing workload increases, and a real-time Ethernet system model where message collisions are deterministically resolved. Given such application, adaptation, and system models, the algorithm's objective is to maximise aggregate application benefit and minimise aggregate missed deadline ratio. Since determining the optimal allocation is computationally intractable, RBA heuristically computes the number of replicas that are needed for task subtasks and their processor assignment such that the resulting allocation is as "close" as possible to the optimal allocation. We also experimentally study RBA's performance under different scheduling and routing algorithms. The experimental results reveal that RBA produces higher aggregate benefit and lower missed deadline ratio under DASA than when the RED algorithm is used for scheduling and routing.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 172
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   End-host architecture for QoS-adaptive communication [J].
Abdelzaher, T ;
Shin, KG .
FOURTH IEEE REAL-TIME TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM - PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :121-130
[2]   APPLYING NEW SCHEDULING THEORY TO STATIC PRIORITY PREEMPTIVE SCHEDULING [J].
AUDSLEY, N ;
BURNS, A ;
RICHARDSON, M ;
TINDELL, K ;
WELLINGS, AJ .
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1993, 8 (05) :284-292
[3]  
BRANDT S, 1998, P IEEE REAL TIME SYS, V19, P307
[4]  
Buttazzo G., 1997, HARD REAL TIME COMPU
[5]  
Buttazzo G., 1995, RESPONSIVE COMPUTER
[6]  
CLARK RK, 1990, THESIS CARNEGIE MELL
[7]  
DEVARASETTY R, 2001, THESIS VIRGINIA POLY
[8]  
HEGAZY T, 2001, THESIS VIRGINIA POLY
[9]  
Hull D., 1997, P IEEE WORKSH MIDDL, P82
[10]  
HUMPHREY M, 1997, P IEEE WORKSH MIDDL