Allowing for population stratification in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction, using genomic control

被引:2
|
作者
Yadav, Pankaj [1 ]
Freitag-Wolf, Sandra [1 ]
Lieb, Wolfgang [2 ]
Dempfle, Astrid [1 ]
Krawczak, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Med Informat & Stat, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Epidemiol, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
关键词
SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; DESIGN; PARENTS; BIAS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/s00439-015-1593-y
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Gene-environment interactions (G x E) have attracted considerable research interest in the past owing to their scientific and public health implications, but powerful statistical methods are required to successfully track down G x E, particularly at a genome-wide level. Previously, a case-only (CO) design has been proposed as a means to identify G x E with greater efficiency than traditional case-control or cohort studies. However, as with genotype-phenotype association studies themselves, hidden population stratification (PS) can impact the validity of G x E studies using a CO design. Since this problem has been subject to little research to date, we used comprehensive simulation to systematically assess the type I error rate, power and effect size bias of CO studies of G x E in the presence of PS. Three types of PS were considered, namely genetic-only (PSG), environment-only (PSE), and joint genetic and environmental stratification (PSGE). Our results reveal that the type I error rate of an unadjusted Wald test, appropriate for the CO design, would be close to its nominal level (0.05 in our study) as long as PS involves only one interaction partner (i.e., either PSG or PSE). In contrast, if the study population is stratified with respect to both G and E (i.e., if there is PSGE), then the type I error rate is seriously inflated and estimates of the underlying G x E interaction are biased. Comparison of CO to a family-based case-parents design confirmed that the latter is more robust against PSGE, as expected. However, case-parent trios may be particularly unsuitable for G x E studies in view of the fact that they require genotype data from parents and that many diseases with an environmental component are likely to be of late onset. An alternative approach to adjusting for PS is principal component analysis (PCA), which has been widely used for this very purpose in past genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, resolving genetic PS properly by PCA requires genetic data at the population level, the availability of which would conflict with the basic idea of the CO design. Therefore, we explored three modified Wald test statistics, inspired by the genomic control (GC) approach to GWAS, as an alternative means to allow for PSGE. The modified statistics were benchmarked against a stratified Wald test assuming known population affiliation, which should provide maximum power under PS. Our results confirm that GC is capable of successfully and efficiently correcting the PS-induced inflation of the type I error rate in CO studies of G x E.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1125
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] The role of linkage disequilibrium in case-only studies of gene-environment interactions
    Yadav, Pankaj
    Freitag-Wolf, Sandra
    Lieb, Wolfgang
    Krawczak, Michael
    HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 134 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [2] Case-Only Gene-Environment Interaction Studies: When Does Association Imply Mechanistic Interaction?
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (04) : 327 - 334
  • [3] Genotype imputation in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction: validity and power
    Aleknonyte-Resch, Milda
    Szymczak, Silke
    Freitag-Wolf, Sandra
    Dempfle, Astrid
    Krawczak, Michael
    HUMAN GENETICS, 2021, 140 (08) : 1217 - 1228
  • [4] Detecting Gene-Environment Interactions Using a Combined Case-Only and Case-Control Approach
    Li, Dalin
    Conti, David V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (04) : 497 - 504
  • [5] Bias in the case-only design applied to studies of gene-environment and gene-gene interaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dennis, Jessica
    Hawken, Steven
    Krewski, Daniel
    Birkett, Nick
    Gheorghe, Mihaela
    Frei, Julia
    McKeown-Eyssen, Gail
    Little, Julian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (05) : 1329 - 1341
  • [6] Two-stage Analysis for Gene-Environment Interaction Utilizing Both Case-Only and Family-Based Analysis
    Chen, Yi-Hau
    Lin, Hui-Wen
    Liu, Huimei
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [7] An easy-to-implement approach for analyzing case-control and case-only studies assuming gene-environment independence and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    Lee, Wen-Chung
    Wang, Liang-Yi
    Cheng, K. F.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (24) : 2557 - 2567
  • [8] Environmental Confounding in Gene-Environment Interaction Studies
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Ko, Yi-An
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 178 (01) : 144 - 152
  • [9] A case-only study of gene-environment interaction between genetic susceptibility variants in NOD2 and cigarette smoking in Crohn's disease aetiology
    Helbig, Katherine L.
    Nothnagel, Michael
    Hampe, Jochen
    Balschun, Tobias
    Nikolaus, Susanna
    Schreiber, Stefan
    Franke, Andre
    Noethlings, Ute
    BMC MEDICAL GENETICS, 2012, 13
  • [10] Testing Gene-Environment Interaction in Large-Scale Case-Control Association Studies: Possible Choices and Comparisons
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    Ahn, Jaeil
    Gruber, Stephen B.
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 175 (03) : 177 - 190