A Comparative Assessment of Thermodynamic and Exergoeconomic Performances of Three Thermochemical Water-Splitting Cycles of Chlorine Family for Hydrogen Production

被引:15
作者
Razi, Faran [1 ]
Hewage, Kasun [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Life Cycle Management Lab LCML, Okanagan, BC, Canada
关键词
Hydrogen; Sustainability; Thermochemical; Cu-Cl; Fe-Cl; Mg-Cl; Exergoeconomic; Environment; CU-CL CYCLE; EXERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY; DESIGN; CARBON; SYSTEM; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116313
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hydrogen production processes utilizing hydrocarbon-based sources as feedstocks have severe environmental implications (when not incorporating carbon capturing and storage technology) in addition to resulting in depletion of non-sustainable naturally occurring fuel sources. In this regard, thermochemical water-splitting is an extremely environmentally benign pathway for obtaining sustainable hydrogen. Thus, this paper studies and comparatively evaluates three different thermochemical cycles of the chlorine family for hydrogen production which include iron-chlorine, copper-chlorine, and magnesium-chlorine cycles. Each cycle is first modeled and simulated in Aspen-plus and then analyzed from thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints. A thermodynamic and exergoeconomic performance comparison of the three thermochemical cycles is further performed in terms of their overall efficiencies, net heat input and rejection rates, exergy destruction rates, unit costs of hydrogen, hourly levelized cost rates, and cost rates of exergy destruction. All cycles are modeled and simulated by considering the incorporation of waste heat recovery from a steel plant and internal heat recovery within each cycle to improve the process efficiencies by reducing the overall thermal energy consumption. According to the performed analyses, the copper-chlorine cycle has the highest energy (79.7%) and exergy (81.1%) efficiencies followed by the iron-chlorine cycle (energy and exergy efficiencies of 48.8% and 49.6%, respectively) with the magnesium-chlorine cycle exhibiting the lowest overall energy (19.8%) and exergy (20.2%) efficiencies. Moreover, the iron-chlorine cycle demonstrates the lowest unit cost of hydrogen (0.7 $/kg) followed by the copper-chlorine cycle (4 $/kg) with the magnesium-chlorine cycle exhibiting an extremely high unit hydrogen cost (8.9 $/kg). This study also identifies certain key factors that largely impact the cost of hydrogen and comprehensively discusses the influence and extent of each factor on the cost of hydrogen.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Comparative assessment of various chlorine family thermochemical cycles for hydrogen production
    Balta, M. Tolga
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Hepbasli, Arif
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (19) : 7802 - 7813
  • [2] Evaluation of an iron-chlorine thermochemical cycle for hydrogen production
    Canavesio, Cristian
    Nassini, Horacio E.
    Bohe, Ana E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (28) : 8620 - 8632
  • [3] Energy and exergy analyses of a steam reforming process for hydrogen production
    Dilmac, Omer Faruk
    Ozkan, Semra K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2008, 5 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [4] Performance analysis of a feasible technology for power and high-purity hydrogen production driven by methane fuel
    Fan, Junming
    Zhu, Lin
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 75 : 103 - 114
  • [5] Hydrogen production by the Cu-Cl thermochemical cycle: Investigation of the key step of hydrolysing CuCl2 to Cu2OCl2 and HCl using a spray reactor
    Ferrandon, Magali S.
    Lewis, Michele A.
    Tatterson, David F.
    Gross, Adam
    Doizi, Denis
    Croize, L.
    Dauvois, V.
    Roujou, J. L.
    Zanella, Y.
    Carles, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (03) : 992 - 1000
  • [6] International Energy Agency, 2019, FUT HYDR
  • [7] Design and performance evaluation of a new biomass and solar based combined system with thermochemical hydrogen production
    Ishaq, H.
    Dincer, I.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 : 395 - 409
  • [8] A comparative evaluation of three Cu-Cl cycles for hydrogen production
    Ishaq, H.
    Dincer, I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (16) : 7958 - 7968
  • [9] Multigeneration system exergy analysis and thermal management of an industrial glassmaking process linked with a Cu-Cl cycle for hydrogen production
    Ishaq, Haris
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Naterer, Greg F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (20) : 9791 - 9801
  • [10] Life cycle assessment study on nuclear based sustainable hydrogen production options
    Karaca, Ali Erdogan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Gu, Junjie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (41) : 22148 - 22159