Management of septic and aseptic prepatellar bursitis: a systematic review

被引:10
作者
Brown, Oliver S. [1 ,4 ]
Smith, T. O. [2 ]
Parsons, T. [3 ]
Benjamin, M. [1 ]
Hing, C. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp, Oxford, England
[3] Epsom & St Helier Hosp, London, England
[4] St George Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
Bursitis; Prepatellar; Knee; Septic; Aseptic; Endoscopic; Antibiotic;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-021-03853-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Despite contributing to significant morbidity in working-age adults, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for prepatellar bursitis. Much of the existing literature combines prepatellar and olecranon bursitis. This systematic review aims to determine the optimal management of prepatellar bursitis. Study design and methods A primary search of electronic published and unpublished literature databases from inception to November 2019 was completed. Articles over 25 years old, case reports with less than four patients, paediatric studies, and non-English language papers were excluded. Our primary outcome was recurrence after 1 year. Comparisons included endoscopic vs open bursectomy, duration of antibiotics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Institute of Health Economics and Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias scoring systems. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate. Results In total 10 studies were included (N = 702). Endoscopic and open bursectomy showed no difference in recurrence after 1 year (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.05-3.53, p = 0.67), and surgical complications (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.34-6.08, p = 0.44). 80% endoscopically-treated patients were pain free after 1 year. Patients treated with antibiotics for less than 8 days were not significantly more prone to recurrence (2/17 vs 10/114, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.13-3.29, p = 0.64) compared to 8 days plus at minimum 1 year post injury. Conclusions Our study represents the largest cohort of patients evaluating management strategies for prepatellar bursitis, and includes data not previously published. Endoscopic bursectomy is non-inferior to open bursectomy, enabling a shorter hospital stay. It also offers a relatively low risk of post-operative pain. Endoscopic bursectomy is a viable option to treat both septic and aseptic prepatellar bursitis. Our small cohort suggests recurrence and hospital stay are not improved with antibiotic treatment exceeding 7 days for septic prepatellar bursitis.
引用
收藏
页码:2445 / 2457
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   PREDISPOSING FACTORS, BACTERIOLOGY AND ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY IN 35 CASES OF SEPTIC BURSITIS [J].
SODERQUIST, B ;
HEDSTROM, SA .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1986, 18 (04) :305-311
[32]  
Steinacker T, 1998, Sportverletz Sportschaden, V12, P162, DOI 10.1055/s-2007-993355
[33]  
Stell IM, 1996, J ACCID EMERG MED, V13, P351
[34]   Management of acute bursitis: outcome study of a structured approach [J].
Stell, IM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1999, 92 (10) :516-521
[35]   One- vs 2-Stage Bursectomy for Septic Olecranon and Prepatellar Bursitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Uckay, Ilker ;
von Dach, Elodie ;
Perez, Cedric ;
Agostinho, Americo ;
Garnerin, Philippe ;
Lipsky, Benjamin A. ;
Hoffmeyer, Pierre ;
Pittet, Didier .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 92 (07) :1061-1069
[36]  
Ulusal AE, 2018, CUREUS
[37]  
WATKINS J T, 1958, Br J Ind Med, V15, P105
[38]  
Witonski D, 1997, Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol, V62, P63