Experimental Study on Demercurization Performance of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System

被引:6
作者
Bao Jingjing [1 ]
Yang Linjun [1 ]
Yan Jinpei [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
wet flue gas desulfurization system; mercury; valence state of mercury; removal; additive; oxidant; FENTON REACTIONS; COAL COMBUSTION; MERCURY REMOVAL; OXIDATION; SORBENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/cjoc.200990376
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The demercurization performance of wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system was investigated by measuring mercury concentrations at the inlet and Outlet of WFGD system with a QM201H mercury analyzer The selected desulfurizer included NH3 center dot H2O, NaOH, Na2Co3, Ca(OH)(2) and CaCO3. The influences of adding oxidant and coagulant such as KMnO4. Fenton reagent, K2S2O8/CuSO4 and Na2S into desulfurization solutions were also studied. The results show that elemental mercury is the main component of gaseous mercury in coal-fired flue gas, and the proportion of oxidized mercury is leas than 36% Oxidized mercury Could be removed by WFGD system efficiently. and the removal efficiency could amount to 81.1%-92.6% However, the concentration of elemental mercury slightly increased at the outlet of WFGD as a result of its insolubility and re-emission Therefore, the removal efficiency of gaseous merctuy is only 13.3%-183%. The mercury removal efficiency of WFGD system increased with increasing the liquid-gas ratio. In addition, adding KMnO4, Fenton reagent, K2S2O8/CuSO4 and Na2S into desulfurization solutions could increase the mercury removal efficiency obviously. Various additives have different effects, and Na2S is demonstrated to be the most efficient, in which a niercury removal efficiency of 67.2% can be reached.
引用
收藏
页码:2242 / 2248
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[鲍静静 BAO Jingfing], 2008, [现代化工, Modern Chemical Industry], V28, P31
[2]   Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber [J].
Chang, JCS ;
Ghorishi, SB .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (24) :5763-5766
[3]   Mercury emission control in coal-fired plants:: The role of wet scrubbers [J].
Diaz-Somoano, Mercedes ;
Unterberger, Sven ;
Hein, Klaus R. G. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 88 (03) :259-263
[4]  
GHORISHI B, 2006, COMBINED POWER PLANT, P28
[5]  
Guo Xin, 2004, Proceedings of the CSEE, V24, P185
[6]  
Han Jun, 2003, Proceedings of the CSEE, V23, P208
[7]   Development of cost-effective noncarbon sorbents for Hg0 removal from coal-fired power plants [J].
Lee, JY ;
Ju, YH ;
Keener, TC ;
Varma, RS .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (08) :2714-2720
[8]   Speciation and mass distribution of mercury in a bituminous coal-fired power plant [J].
Lee, SJ ;
Seo, YC ;
Jang, HN ;
Park, KS ;
Baek, JI ;
An, HS ;
Song, KC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (12) :2215-2224
[9]  
[杨宏旻 YANG Hongmin], 2006, [动力工程, Power engineering], V26, P554
[10]   Mercury removal from coal combustion by Fenton reactions - Part A: Bench-scale tests [J].
Lu, Dennis ;
Anthony, Edward J. ;
Tan, Yewen ;
Dureau, Robert ;
Ko, Vivien ;
Douglas, Mark A. .
FUEL, 2007, 86 (17-18) :2789-2797