Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast Computed Tomography for Appendicitis in Adults: A Systematic Review

被引:64
作者
Hlibczuk, Veronica [1 ]
Dattaro, Judith A. [2 ]
Jin, Zhezhen [3 ]
Falzon, Louise [4 ]
Brown, Michael D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Div Emergency Med, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Div Emergency Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Biostat, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Div Emergency Med, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
UNENHANCED HELICAL CT; SUSPECTED ACUTE APPENDICITIS; NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY; ORAL CONTRAST; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; IMPACT; EMERGENCY; US; ABDOMEN; PELVIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.509
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We seek to determine the diagnostic test characteristics of noncontrast computed tomography (CT) for appendicitis in the adult emergency department (ED) population. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the bibliographies of previous systematic reviews. Included studies assessed the diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT for acute appendicitis in adults by using the final diagnosis at surgery or follow-up at a minimum of 2 weeks as the reference standard. Studies were included only if the CT was completed using a multislice helical scanner. Two authors independently conducted the relevance screen of titles and abstracts, selected studies for the final inclusion, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Consensus was reached by conference, and any disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Unenhanced CT test performance was assessed with summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with independently pooled sensitivity and specificity values across studies. Results: The search yielded 1,258 publications; 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1,060 patients. The included studies were of high methodological quality with respect to appropriate patient spectrum and reference standard. Our pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 92.7% (95% confidence interval 89.5% to 95.0%) and 96.1% (95% confidence interval 94.2% to 97.5%), respectively; the positive likelihood ratio=24 and the negative likelihood ratio=0.08. Conclusion: We found the diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the adult population to be adequate for clinical decisionmaking in the ED setting. [Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:51-59.]
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults [J].
Anderson, BA ;
Salem, L ;
Flum, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (03) :474-478
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REV MAN REVMAN COMP
[3]   Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: Prospective validation [J].
Antevil, Jared L. ;
Rivera, Louis ;
Langenberg, Bret J. ;
Hahm, George ;
Favata, Michael A. ;
Brown, Carlos V. R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (06) :849-856
[4]  
Ashraf Kashif, 2006, JPMA Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, V56, P200
[5]  
Balthazar EJ, 1998, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V93, P768
[6]   Imaging for suspected appendicitis: Negative appendectomy and perforation rates [J].
Bendeck, SE ;
Nino-Murcia, M ;
Berry, GJ ;
Jeffrey, RB .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 (01) :131-136
[7]   Appendicitis at the millennium [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :337-348
[8]  
Brontvein A T, 2002, Khirurgiia (Mosk), P13
[9]  
Cakirer Sinan, 2002, Emerg Radiol, V9, P155
[10]   Unenhanced helical CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis changes disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute appendicitis [J].
Christopher, FL ;
Lane, MJ ;
Ward, JA ;
Morgan, JA .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 23 (01) :1-7