Robotic laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems

被引:24
作者
Kakeji, Y.
Konishi, K.
Ieiri, S.
Yasunaga, T.
Nakamoto, M.
Tanoue, K.
Baba, H.
Maehara, Y.
Hashizume, M.
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Ctr Integrat Adv Med & Innovat Technol, Dept Disaster & Emergency, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Surg & Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Dept Innovat Med Technol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[4] Kyushu Univ, Ctr Integrat Adv Med & Innovat Technol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[5] Kumamoto Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
关键词
robotics; gastrectomy; da Vinci; Zeus; telemanipulator;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.104
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The robotic surgical systems working on a master-slave principle have been developed and used in the worldwide in cardiac, urologic, and general surgery. Methods The two robotic systems, the da Vinci and the Zeus Robotic Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Calif., USA), were compared with the aim of evaluating operative feasibility and technical efficacy in distal gastrectomy. Results During laparoscopic gastrectomy, the do Vinci System (n = 2) had a shorter total operative time (445 versus 656 minutes; p = 0.09) and less blood loss (65 versus 277 mL; p = 0.08) compared with the Zeus System (n = 3). The articulated instruments of both systems were useful in lymph node dissection, isolation of vessels in fat tissue, ligation of vessels, and intraabdominal anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract. Robotic laparoscopic procedures can be performed effectively using either the da Vinci or Zeus System. Conclusion In this limited study, the robotic instruments, especially those of da Vinci system, made it easier to complete tissue dissection including lymph nodes, complicated endoscopic anastomoses, and ligatures in a closed cavity. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy [J].
Adachi, Y ;
Suematsu, T ;
Shiraishi, N ;
Katsuta, T ;
Morimoto, A ;
Kitano, S ;
Akazawa, K .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (01) :49-54
[2]   Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems [J].
Dakin, GF ;
Gagner, M .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (04) :574-579
[3]   Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, A ;
Gagner, M ;
Miller, JH ;
Steiner, CP ;
Hahn, JF .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (09) :957-961
[4]   Early international results of laparoscopic gastrectomies [J].
Goh, PMY ;
Alponat, A ;
Mak, K ;
Kum, CK .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (06) :650-652
[5]  
Hashizume M, 2004, PRIMER OF ROBOTIC & TELEROBOTIC SURGERY, P147
[6]   Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system [J].
Hashizume, M ;
Shimada, M ;
Tomikawa, M ;
Ikeda, Y ;
Takahashi, I ;
Abe, R ;
Koga, F ;
Gotoh, N ;
Konishi, K ;
Maehara, S ;
Sugimachi, K .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (08) :1187-1191
[7]   Wrist-enhanced instrumentation:: Moving toward totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Kappert, U ;
Schneider, J ;
Cichon, R ;
Gulielmos, V ;
Matschke, K ;
Tugtekin, SM ;
Schüler, S .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (03) :1105-1108
[8]   Current status of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in Japan [J].
Kitano, S ;
Shiraishi, N .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (02) :182-185
[9]   ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY OF ESOPHAGOGASTRIC TUMORS [J].
LAMBERT, R .
ENDOSCOPY, 1992, 24 (1-2) :24-33
[10]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine horn anastomosis [J].
Margossian, H ;
Garcia-Ruiz, A ;
Falcone, T ;
Goldberg, JM ;
Attaran, M ;
Gagner, M .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (03) :530-534