Multi-stage trips: An exploration of factors affecting mode combination choice of travelers in England

被引:14
作者
Basheer, Muhammad Aamir [1 ,2 ]
van der Waerden, Peter [1 ]
Kochan, Bruno [1 ]
Bellemans, Tom [1 ]
Shah, Syyed Adnan Raheel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hasselt Univ, Transportat Res Inst IMOB, Wetenschapspk 5 Bus 6, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Ctr Mobil & Spatial Planning AMRP, Sint Pietersnieuwstr 41 B2-1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Pakistan Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Multan 60000, Pakistan
关键词
Mode choice; Multi-stage trips; Mode combination; Sustainable transport; Multinomial logistic regression; PUBLIC-TRANSPORT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A tremendous growth has been observed in the use of personal vehicles. Increase in private vehicle use has created many environmental, social and economic problems. A multi-stage trip can help to elevate the problems of delays, environmental degradation, and congestion. Multi-stage trips provide the benefits of smarter, cleaner and sustainable transport. This paper focuses on the organization of different multi-stage trips with respect to first mile, main stage, and last mile and factors that influence the choice of these mode combinations. A multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model is used to evaluate the factors that affect the choice of different mode combinations in a multi-stage trip. For most of the combinations, the trip purpose is significantly associated with mode choice for these combinations. In most cases, availability of the car results in a decline of probability for choosing a combination involving walk. The families with children prefer to take a combination involving a car or public transport at the first or last mile. This study only focuses on the mode combination of 3-stage trips so, an analysis can also be made for multi-stage trips having more than 3 stages.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Almasri E., 2013, J TRANSPORTATION TEC, V03, P247, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2013.34026, DOI 10.4236/JTTS.2013.34026]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 92 ANN M TRANSP RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics
[4]  
Appleyard B, 2015, 2015 TRANSP RES BOAR
[5]   Trip characteristics of travelers without vehicles [J].
Arasan, VT ;
Rengaraju, VR ;
Rao, KVK .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (01) :76-81
[6]   Jointly estimated cross-sectional mode choice models: Specification and forecast performance [J].
Badoe, DA ;
Wadhawan, B .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2002, 128 (03) :259-269
[7]   Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study [J].
Beirao, Gabriela ;
Cabral, J. A. Sarsfield .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2007, 14 (06) :478-489
[8]   Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: Econometric structure and application to intercity travel [J].
Bhat, CR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1997, 31 (01) :11-21
[9]   Modelling route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks [J].
Bovy, PHL ;
Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S .
TRANSPORTATION, 2005, 32 (04) :341-368
[10]   Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA [J].
Buehler, Ralph .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (04) :644-657