Tri-objective optimization of noisy dataset in blast furnace iron-making process using evolutionary algorithms

被引:18
作者
Mahanta, Bashista Kumar [1 ]
Chakraborti, Nirupam [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
Modeling; blast furnace; optimization; reference vector; evolutionary computation; deep neural network; genetic programming; KIMEME; parallel plotting; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY; CONSTRUCTAL DESIGN; NEURAL-NETWORK; MODEL; FLOW; MINIMIZATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/10426914.2019.1643472
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Data-driven models are used to solve many objective blast furnace problems by using evolutionary approach. The process variables and the objectives of the blast furnace are highly complex and hence, solving of these multi-objective optimization problems is not an easy task. Here, a deep evolutionary neural network (EvoDN2), bi-objective genetic programming (BioGP), evolutionary neural net (EvoNN) and constrained version reference vector evolutionary algorithm (cRVEA) are used to solve these optimization problems. Pareto tradeoffs between various conflicting objectives such as gas velocity in tuyere, total heat loss, productivity, heat loss owing to tuyere cooling, coke rate, heat loss during plate cooling, and the amount of gas flow in the blast furnace and the carbon requirement per ton of hot metal, etc. are determined and subsequently used to solve tri-objective optimization problems pertinent to the process. The optimized results are compared against a commercial software KIMEME with multiple modules. The results obtained and the performances of these models are analyzed in three-dimensional space and their influence on the iron-making process is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 686
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Analysing blast furnace data using evolutionary neural network and multiobjective genetic algorithms
    Agarwal, A.
    Tewary, U.
    Pettersson, F.
    Das, S.
    Saxen, H.
    Chakraborti, N.
    [J]. IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 2010, 37 (05) : 353 - 359
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, ENTROPY SWITZ, DOI DOI 10.3390/e18100353
  • [3] A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: AMOSA
    Bandyopadhyay, Sanghamitra
    Saha, Sriparna
    Maulik, Ujjwal
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2008, 12 (03) : 269 - 283
  • [4] Chakraborti N., 2014, Applications of Metaheuristics in Process Engineering, P89
  • [5] Chakraborti N., 2013, INFORM MAT SCI ENG, P71
  • [6] Chakraborti N, 2016, ADV CHEM MAT ENG B, P346, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-0290-6.ch012
  • [7] Critical Assessment 3: The unique contributions of multi-objective evolutionary and genetic algorithms in materials research
    Chakraborti, Nirupam
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 30 (11) : 1259 - 1262
  • [8] A predictive system for blast furnaces by integrating a neural network with qualitative analysis
    Chen, J
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 14 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [9] A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization
    Cheng, Ran
    Jin, Yaochu
    Olhofer, Markus
    Sendhoff, Bernhard
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (05) : 773 - 791
  • [10] A Surrogate-Assisted Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Computationally Expensive Many-Objective Optimization
    Chugh, Tinkle
    Jin, Yaochu
    Miettinen, Kaisa
    Hakanen, Jussi
    Sindhya, Karthik
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2018, 22 (01) : 129 - 142