Marker-less versus marker-based driven musculoskeletal models of the spine during static load-handling activities

Evaluation of workers' body posture in workstations is a prerequisite to estimate spinal loads and assess risk of injury for the subsequent design of preventive interventions. The Microsoft Kinect (TM) sensor is, in this regard, advantageous over the traditional skin-marker-based optical motion capture systems for being marker-less, portable, cost-effective, and easy-to-use in real workplaces. While several studies have demonstrated the validity/reliability of the Kinect for posture measurements especially during gait trials, its capability to adequately drive a detailed spine musculoskeletal model for injury risk assessments remains to be investigated. Lumbosacral (L5-S1) load predictions of a Kinect-driven and a gold-standard marker-based Vicon-driven musculoskeletal model were compared for various standing static load-handling activities at different heights/asymmetry angles/distances. Full body kinematics of eight individuals each performing eighteen activities were simultaneously recorded by a single-front-placed Kinect and a 10-camera Vicon motion capture system and input to AnyBody Modeling System. The predicted spinal loads by the two models were in average different by 17.8 and 25.9% for the L5-S1 disc compressive and shear forces, respectively, with smaller errors for the activities at higher load heights. Some activities performed near the floor could, however, not be recorded by a single-front-placed Kinect sensor due to the joint occlusion. The capability of the Kinect to adequately drive a spine musculoskeletal model depended on the complexity of the activity. While a single front-placed Kinect camera can be used to evaluate spinal loads in a wide range of static/quasi-static activities, cautious should be exercised when evaluating tasks performed near the floor. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.