X-ray examination dose surveys: how accurate are my results?

被引:3
作者
Taylor, Stephen [1 ]
Van Muylem, Alain [2 ]
Howarth, Nigel [3 ]
Gevenois, Pierre Alain [4 ]
Tack, Denis [5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Ambroise Pare, Dept Radiol, Blvd President Kennedy 2, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
[2] Hop Erasme, Dept Pneumol, Route Lennik 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Clin Grangettes, Dept Radiol, 7 Chemin Grangettes, CH-1224 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Hop Erasme, Dept Radiol, Route Lennik 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[5] EPICURA, Clin Louis Caty, Dept Radiol, Rue Louis Caty 136, B-7331 Baudour, Belgium
关键词
Radiation protection; Radiography; Surveys and questionnaires; RADIOLOGY; SIZE; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-019-06055-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the variabilities of dose-area-products (DAP) of frequent X-ray examinations collected for comparison with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Methods DAP values of chest, abdomen, and lumbar spine examinations obtained on devices from two manufacturers were collected in three centers over 1 to 2 years. The variability of the average DAP results defined as the 95% confidence interval in percentage of their median value was calculated for increasing sample sizes, each examination and center. We computed the sample sizes yielding variabilities lower or equal to 25% and 10%. The effect of narrowing patient selection based on body weight was also investigated (ranges of 67-73 Kg, or 60-80 Kg). Results DAP variabilities ranged from 75 to 170% of the median value when collecting small samples (10 to 20 DAP). To reduce this variability, larger samples are needed, collected over up to 2 years, regardless of the examination and center. A variability <= 10% could only be reached for chest X-rays, requiring up to 800 data. For the abdomen and lumbar spine, the lowest achievable variability was 25%, regardless of the body weight selection, requiring up to 400 data. Conclusion Variabilities in DAP collected through small samples of ten data as recommended by authorities are very high, but can be reduced down to 25% (abdomen and lumbar spine) or even 10% (chest) through a substantial increase in sample sizes. Our findings could assist radiologists and regulatory authorities in estimating the reliability of the data obtained when performing X-ray dose surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:5307 / 5313
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Advisory Committee on Radiological Protection, 1997, RAD DOS MED DIAGN PR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, 204 AAPM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1999, Radiation Protection 109: guidance on diagnostic reference levels for medical exposures
  • [4] Through the Looking Glass Revisited: The Need for More Meaning and Less Drama in the Reporting of Dose and Dose Reduction in CT
    Bankier, Alexander A.
    Kressel, Herbert Y.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [5] Diagnostic radiology in Norway-trends in examination frequency and collective effective dose
    Borretzen, Ingelin
    Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
    Olerud, Hilde Merete
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2007, 124 (04) : 339 - 347
  • [6] Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso
    Christner, Jodie A.
    Braun, Natalie N.
    Jacobsen, Megan C.
    Carter, Rickey E.
    Kofler, James M.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) : 841 - 847
  • [7] European commission, 2008, RAD PROT N 154 EUR G
  • [8] Health Protection Agency-Centre for Radiation Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division, 2007, DOS PAT RAD FLUOR X
  • [9] Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog
    Mettler, Fred A., Jr.
    Huda, Walter
    Yoshizumi, Terry T.
    Mahesh, Mahadevappa
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (01) : 254 - 263
  • [10] National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), 2002, DOS PAT MED X RAY EX