Assessing Resilience in Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Review

被引:11
作者
Aldea, Adina [1 ]
Vaicekauskaite, Egle [1 ]
Daneva, Maya [2 ]
Piest, Jean Paul Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Ind Engn & Business Informat Syst, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Cybersecur & Safety, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
2020 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDOC 2020) | 2020年
关键词
resilience; enterprise architecture; systematic review; assessment; metrics; strategy; ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE; DESIGN; FRAMEWORK; DEFINITIONS; AREAS; RISK;
D O I
10.1109/EDOC49727.2020.00011
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This review paper aims to explore state-of-the-art research and scientific literature about Enterprise Architecture (EA) resilience. Based on a systematic literature review, 850 articles have been subjected to evaluation for relevance. Based on the findings in 58 selected papers, we conclude that the field of EA resilience is still in its infancy. We identified several definitions and classified six types of resilience measures, based on information type (qualitative/quantitative), the source of the disruption (internal/external), and the duration of the resilience (short-term/long-term). Based on the review, we found 19 metrics that are candidates for EA practitioners to consider for the design of measurement and assessment methods for EA resilience. In addition, we identified relevant research from Information Systems sub-domains and other sciences that can be incorporated to create a holistic view on EA resilience. Based on published definitions of resilience in the selected papers, we propose a definition of the concept of EA resilience. This definition is validated using expert opinion and creates a starting point for reasoning about EA resilience and future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Resilience Benchmarking of Transactional Systems: Experimental Study of Alternative Metrics
    Almeida, Raquel
    Neto, Afonso Araujo
    Madeira, Henrique
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 22ND PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEPENDABLE COMPUTING (PRDC 2017), 2017, : 40 - 49
  • [2] Identifying useful actions to improve team resilience in information systems projects
    Amaral, Antonio
    Fernandes, Gabriela
    Varajao, Joao
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT/CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERIS/PROJMAN / HCIST 2015, 2015, 64 : 1182 - 1189
  • [3] Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures
    Andersson, Thomas
    Caker, Mikael
    Tengblad, Stefan
    Wickelgren, Mikael
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 35 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, STAKEHOLDER GOAL ANA, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8
  • [5] Trustworthiness requirements for manufacturing cyber-physical systems
    Babiceanu, Radu F.
    Seker, Remzi
    [J]. 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, FAIM2017, 2017, 11 : 973 - 981
  • [6] Band I., 2015, LANGUAGE
  • [7] Barn B., 2015, 23 EUR C INF SYST EC, V2015
  • [8] Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions
    Bhamra, Ran
    Dani, Samir
    Burnard, Kevin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (18) : 5375 - 5393
  • [9] Resilience in engineered resilient systems
    Buchanan, Randy K.
    Goerger, Simon R.
    Rinaudo, Christina H.
    Parnell, Greg
    Ross, Adam
    Sitterle, Valerie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2020, 17 (04): : 435 - 446
  • [10] Designing for networked community resilience
    Comes, Tina
    [J]. HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY: SCIENCE, SYSTEMS AND GLOBAL IMPACT 2016, HUMTECH2016, 2016, 159 : 6 - 11