Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women

被引:54
作者
Kave, Mania [1 ]
Parooie, Fateme [2 ]
Salarzaei, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Zabol Univ Med Sci, Gynecol & Obstet Inst, Fac Med, Zabol, Iran
[2] Zabol Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Fac Med, Zabol, Iran
关键词
Pregnancy; Acute appendicitis; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); LOWER QUADRANT PAIN; NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY RATE; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PELVIC PAIN; LAPAROTOMY RATE; ABDOMINAL-PAIN; ACCURACY; CT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s13017-019-0254-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy.MethodsThe searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MK, MS) to find the relevant studies published from 1/1/2009 until end of 30/12/2018. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASETM via Ovid, The Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS. The keywords used in the search strategy are Pregnancy [MeSH], Pregnant [MeSH] OR-Magnetic resonance imaging [MeSH] OR-Appendicitis [MeSH] OR-Ultrasound, [MeSH] OR, imaging, MRI [MeSH] OR"?" and Right lower quadrant pain [MeSH]. The risk of bias of every article was evaluated by using QUADAS-2. On the basis of the results from the 2 x 2 tables, pooled measures for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curves (AUC) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian Lair methodology.ResultsAs many as 1164 studies were selected. After analyzing the correspondence of the studies with the required criteria, 19 studies were selected for the final review. For appendicitis in pregnancy, the MRI sensitivity was 91.8% at the 95% confidence interval of (95% CI 87.7-94.9%). At the confidence interval of 95%, the specificity was 97.9% (95% CI 0.97.2-100%). The risk of bias in the studies conducted was measured using the QUADAS-2 tool.ConclusionMRI has high sensitivity and specificity (91.8%, 97.9% respectively) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant patients with clinically suspected appendicitis. It is an excellent imaging technique in many instances, which does not expose a fetus, or the mother, to ionizing radiation, making it an excellent option for pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   The laparoscopic management of appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy [J].
Affleck, DG ;
Handrahan, DL ;
Egger, MJ ;
Price, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 178 (06) :523-528
[2]   Impact of appendicitis during pregnancy: No delay in accurate diagnosis and treatment [J].
Aggenbach, L. ;
Zeeman, G. G. ;
Cantineau, A. E. P. ;
Gordijn, S. J. ;
Hofker, H. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 15 :84-89
[3]  
Aguilera F, 2018, AM SURGEON, V84, P1326
[4]   Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy [J].
Andersson, REB ;
Lambe, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (06) :1281-1285
[5]   Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves [J].
Arends, L. R. ;
Hamza, T. H. ;
van Houwelingen, J. C. ;
Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H. ;
Hunink, M. G. M. ;
Stijnen, T. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) :621-638
[6]  
Aydn S, ANKARA EITIM VE ARAT, V51, P110
[7]  
BABAKNIA A, 1977, OBSTET GYNECOL, V50, P40
[8]   Comparing the diagnostic performance of MRI versus CT in the evaluation of acute nontraumatic abdominal pain during pregnancy [J].
Keren Tuvia Baron ;
Elizabeth Kagan Arleo ;
Christopher Robinson ;
Pina C. Sanelli .
Emergency Radiology, 2012, 19 (6) :519-525
[9]   Imaging During Pregnancy [J].
Baysinger, Curtis L. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 110 (03) :863-867
[10]   MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients [J].
Birchard, KR ;
Brown, MA ;
Hyslop, WB ;
Firat, Z ;
Semelka, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) :452-458