Acetabular Revision Surgery with Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup for Failed Acetabular Cage Reconstruction with Bone Allografts: A Retrospective Study with Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up

被引:3
|
作者
Hsu, Chen-Heng [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Chih-Chien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Chih-Hsiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Yu-Han [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shih, Hsin-Nung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Chun-Chieh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Bone & Joint Res Ctr, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
关键词
tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cup; failed cage reconstruction; revision hip arthroplasty; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; DEFECTS; CLASSIFICATION; TERIPARATIDE; GRAFTS; RING;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11123428
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acetabular cage reconstruction with bone allografts is among the successful strategies to deal with massive acetabular bone loss. However, the nonbiological fixation nature of cages can compromise long-term success. Tantalum trabecular metal acetabular cups (TM cups) have been used in acetabular revision surgery because of their increased initial stability and good bone ingrowth features. This study was performed to determine whether the bone stock of the acetabulum is enough to support a hemispheric TM cup after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received acetabular revision surgery with TM cups after failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts from 2006 to 2017. There were 12 patients (5 males and 7 females) included in this study, with a mean age of 61.5 years (38 to 81) at the time of re-revision surgery. The mean follow-up after re-revision surgery was 8.6 years (2.6 to 13.3). The endpoint was defined as the aseptic loosening of the TM cup and reoperation for any causes. The change in bone stock of the acetabulum between index revision and re-revision was assessed according to the Gross classification for acetabular bone loss. Results: One patient died after eight years of follow-up of a cause not related to hip surgery. Two patients received two-stage revision arthroplasty due to PJI after 3.2 and 9.4 years of follow-up, respectively. The bone stock of the acetabulum was significantly improved between index revision and re-revision surgery (p < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 100% with aseptic loosening as the endpoint and 90% and 75% at five- and ten-year follow-up, respectively, with reoperation for any reason as the endpoint. Even cage reconstruction with bone allografts will fail eventually, and the bone stock of the acetabulum will improve after union and incorporation between host bone and allografts. The restored bone stocks will facilitate further revision surgery with hemispheric TM cups. The biological fixation between host bone and tantalum trabecular metal can provide longstanding stability of the TM cup. Conclusions: The results of our study offer a viable option for patients with failed cage reconstruction with bone allografts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components for Failed Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: A Mid-term Follow-up Study
    Huang, De-Yong
    Zhang, Liang
    Zhou, Yi-Xin
    Zhang, Chun-Yu
    Xu, Hui
    Huang, Yong
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (08) : 903 - 908
  • [2] Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components for Failed Treatment of Acetabular Fractures: A Mid-term Follow-up Study
    Huang De-Yong
    Zhang Liang
    Zhou Yi-Xin
    Zhang Chun-Yu
    Xu Hui
    Huang Yong
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (08) : 903 - 908
  • [3] Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up
    Russell, Shane P.
    O'Neill, Cathleen J.
    Fahey, Eoin J.
    Guerin, Shane
    Gul, Rehan
    Harty, James A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (05) : 1740 - 1745
  • [4] Long-term outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting with cemented cups and trabecular metal for revision hip arthroplasty: a follow-up study
    Curtin, Mark
    Russell, Shane P.
    Mirdad, Rayyan S.
    Irwin, Shane C.
    Rowan, Fiachra E.
    Masterson, Eric L.
    Condon, Finbarr
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (06) : 764 - 771
  • [5] Acetabular revision surgery with the LOR cup: Three to 8 years' follow-up
    Surace, MF
    Zatti, G
    De Pietri, M
    Cherubino, P
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (01) : 114 - 121
  • [6] Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups
    Zhang, Ji
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Baochun
    Zhou, Yixin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (05) : 811 - 818
  • [7] Acetabular reconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting in revision arthroplasty-a mean five years of follow-up
    Zazgyva, Ancuta
    Zuh, Sandor-Gyoergy
    Roman, Ciprian Oliviu
    Gergely, Istvan
    Pop, Tudor Sorin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 40 (08) : 1631 - 1638
  • [8] Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study
    Koester, Georg
    Rading, Sabine
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2009, 129 (05) : 603 - 608
  • [9] Hip Arthroplasty With the Use of a Reconstruction Cage and Porous Metal Augment to Treat Massive Acetabular Bone Loss: A Midterm Follow-Up
    Garceau, Simon P.
    Warschawski, Yaniv
    Joly, Denis
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (07) : S636 - S641
  • [10] Mid-term Follow-up of the Direct Anterior Approach in Acetabular Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Reconstruction Cage With Impaction Grafting
    Thaler, Martin
    Dammerer, Dietmar
    Leitner, Hermann
    Lindtner, Richard A.
    Nogler, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05) : 1339 - 1343