Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation with Mastoidal Three-Layer Flap Technique

被引:7
作者
Ulug, Tuncay [1 ]
Teker, Aysenur Meric [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Istanbul Fac Med, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Vakif Gureba Training & Res Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES | 2009年 / 71卷 / 05期
关键词
Cochlear implantation; Complications; Minimally invasive surgery; Sensorineural hearing loss; Superficial musculoaponeurotic system; Surgical technique; SURGICAL APPROACH; FIXATION; SURGERY; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1159/000258680
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Aims: To describe and evaluate a minimally invasive cochlear implantation approach using mastoidal three-layer flap (TLF) technique. Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical study at a tertiary referral center. The study population comprised 32 males and 16 females, with an age range of 1-51 years. Thirty-nine patients were operated on using the TLF technique and 9 patients were operated on using a classical cochlear implantation technique. The TLF technique was based on using the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) as an additional, strong flap layer. The TLF, with 3 different pedicules, comprised an anteriorly based 4-cm skin flap, a superiorly based temporomastoidal flap, which included the SMAS, and an anteriorly based periostal Palva type flap in the same mastoidal area. Results: No major complications, including flap-wound problems and receiver-stimulator migration or extrusion, were encountered. The mean operation time was 66 min in the TLF population and 92 min in the classical operation population, which shows a statistically significant difference noted in the time of operation (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The TLF cochlear implantation enables complete receiver-stimulator coverage and safe fixation without any additional procedures, while allowing reduced operation time. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Beeson WH, 1993, FACIAL PLAST SURG CL, V1, P197
[2]   Medical and surgical complications of the second 100 adult cochlear implant patients in Birmingham [J].
Dutt, SN ;
Ray, J ;
Hadjihannas, E ;
Donaldson, I ;
Proops, DW .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2005, 119 (10) :759-764
[3]  
Gibson WPR, 1995, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V109, P56
[4]   Cochlear implantation without mastoidectomy:: The pericanal electrode insertion technique [J].
Häusler, R .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2002, 122 (07) :715-719
[5]  
HOUSE WF, 1976, ANN OTOL RHINOL S27, V85, P2
[6]   Device fixation and small incision access for pediatric cochlear implants [J].
James, AL ;
Papsin, BC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 68 (08) :1017-1022
[7]  
Jansen C, 1968, J Laryngol Otol, V82, P779, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100069462
[8]   Minimally invasive approach and fixation of cochlear and middle ear implants [J].
Jiang, D ;
Bibas, A ;
O'Connor, AF .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 29 (06) :618-620
[9]   Veria operation updated [J].
Kiratzidis, T ;
Arnold, W ;
Iliades, T .
ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 2002, 64 (06) :406-412
[10]  
Kronenberg J, 2004, OTOL NEUROTOL, V25, P41, DOI 10.1097/00129492-200401000-00008