Attentional control theory: Anxiety, emotion, and motor planning

被引:98
作者
Coombes, Stephen A. [1 ,2 ]
Higgins, Torrie [3 ]
Gamble, Kelly M. [3 ]
Cauraugh, James H. [3 ]
Janelle, Christopher M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Kinesiol & Nutr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Attention; Force production; Trait anxiety; Affect; Inhibition; PROCESSING-EFFICIENCY THEORY; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; VISUAL-SEARCH; PERFORMANCE; FORCE; MECHANISMS; MOVEMENT; SYSTEM; THREAT; TRAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.009
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study investigated how trait anxiety alters the balance between attentional control systems to impact performance of a discrete preplanned goal-directed motor task. Participants executed targeted force contractions (engaging the goal-directed attentional system) at the offset of emotional and non-emotional distractors (engaging the stimulus-driven attentional system). High and low anxious participants completed the protocol at two target force levels (10% and 35% of maximum voluntary contraction). Reaction time (RT), performance accuracy, and rate of change of force were calculated. Expectations were confirmed at the 10% but not the 35% target force level: (1) high anxiety was associated with slower RTs, and (2) threat cues lead to faster RTs independently of trait anxiety. These new findings Suggest that motor efficiency, but not motor effectiveness is compromised in high relative to low anxious individuals. We conclude that increased stimulus-driven attentional control interferes with movements that require greater attentional resources. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1079
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP [J].
Arnell, Karen M. ;
Killman, Kassandra V. ;
Fijavz, David .
EMOTION, 2007, 7 (03) :465-477
[2]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[3]   Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study [J].
Bar-Haim, Yair ;
Lamy, Dominique ;
Pergamin, Lee ;
Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J. ;
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (01) :1-24
[4]   On the causal mechanisms of stereotype threat: Can skills that don't rely heavily on working memory still be threatened? [J].
Beilock, Sian L. ;
Jellison, William A. ;
Rydell, Robert J. ;
McConnell, Allen R. ;
Carr, Thomas H. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (08) :1059-1071
[5]   More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving [J].
Beilock, SL ;
Kulp, CA ;
Holt, LE ;
Carr, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (04) :584-600
[6]   Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion [J].
Blair, K. S. ;
Smith, B. W. ;
Mitchell, D. G. V. ;
Morton, J. ;
Vythilingam, M. ;
Pessoa, L. ;
Fridberg, D. ;
Zametkin, A. ;
Nelson, E. E. ;
Drevets, W. C. ;
Pine, D. S. ;
Martin, A. ;
Blair, R. J. R. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 35 (01) :430-440
[7]   Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study [J].
Bledowski, C ;
Prvulovic, D ;
Goebel, R ;
Zanella, FE ;
Linden, DEJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 22 (02) :530-540
[8]   Stereotype internalization and women's math performance: The role of interference in working memory [J].
Bonnot, Virginie ;
Croizet, Jean-Claude .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (06) :857-866
[9]   Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Mogg, K ;
Falla, SJ ;
Hamilton, LR .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1998, 12 (06) :737-753
[10]  
Calvo M.G., 1989, Anxiety Research, V2, P45, DOI DOI 10.1080/08917778908249325