Activity of exemestane in metastatic breast cancer after failure of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: A phase II trial

被引:253
作者
Lonning, PE [1 ]
Bajetta, E
Murray, R
Tubiana-Hulin, M
Eisenberg, PD
Mickiewicz, E
Celio, L
Pitt, P
Mita, M
Aaronson, NK
Fowst, C
Arkhipov, A
di Salle, E
Polli, A
Massimini, G
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Oncol, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[2] Ist Nazl Tumori, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Pharmacia & Upjohn, Milan, Italy
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Ctr Rene Huguenin, St Cloud, France
[6] Marin Oncol Associates Inc, Greenbrae, CA USA
[7] Inst AH Roffo, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc, Kalamazoo, MI 49001 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2234
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of a new steroidal aromatase inactivator, exemestane, in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who had progressive disease (PD) after treatment with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor, Patients and Methods: In this phase II trial, eligible patients were treated with exemestane 25 mg daily (n = 241) followed, at the time PD was determined, by exemestane 100 mg daily (n = 58). Results: On the basis of the intent-to-treat analysis by independent review, exemestane 25 mg produced objective responses in 6.6% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 10.6%) and overall success (complete response + partial response + no change for 24 weeks or longer) in 24.3% (95% CI, 19.0% to 30.2%). The median durations of objective response and overall success were 58.4 weeks (95% CI, 49.7 to 71.1 weeks) and 37.0 weeks (95% CI, 35.0 to 39.4 weeks), respectively. Increasing the dose of exemestane to 100 mg upon the development of PD produced one partial response (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 9.2%). Both dosages were well tolerated and were discontinued because of adverse events in only 1.7% of patients. Conclusion: Exemestane 25 mg once daily seems to be an attractive alternative to chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after multiple hormonal therapies have failed. J Clin Oncol 18:2234-2244. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2234 / 2244
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   INACTIVATION OF AROMATASE INVITRO BY 4-HYDROXY-4-ANDROSTENE-3, 17-DIONE AND 4-ACETOXY-4-ANDROSTENE-3, 17-DIONE AND SUSTAINED EFFECTS INVIVO [J].
BRODIE, AMH ;
GARRETT, WM ;
HENDRICKSON, JR ;
TSAIMORRIS, CH ;
MARCOTTE, PA ;
ROBINSON, CH .
STEROIDS, 1981, 38 (06) :693-702
[3]  
Brun B, 1997, CANCER, V79, P2137, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970601)79:11<2137::AID-CNCR11>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-3
[5]   Anastrozole, a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, versus megestrol acetate in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: Results of overview analysis of two phase III trials [J].
Buzdar, A ;
Jonat, W ;
Howell, A ;
Jones, SE ;
Blomqvist, C ;
Vogel, CL ;
Eiermann, W ;
Wolter, JM ;
Azab, M ;
Webster, A ;
Plourde, PV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (07) :2000-2011
[6]  
Buzdar AU, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V83, P1142, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980915)83:6<1142::AID-CNCR13>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-7
[8]  
DISALLE D, 1994, SEX HORMONES ANTIHOR, P303
[9]   EXEMESTANE (FCE-24304), A NEW STEROIDAL AROMATASE INHIBITOR [J].
DISALLE, E ;
ORNATI, G ;
GIUDICI, D ;
LASSUS, M ;
EVANS, TRJ ;
COOMBES, RC .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 43 (1-3) :137-143
[10]   Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer: Double-blind randomized trial showing a dose effect and improved efficacy and tolerability compared with megestrol acetate [J].
Dombernowsky, P ;
Smith, I ;
Falkson, G ;
Leonard, R ;
Panasci, L ;
Bellmunt, J ;
Bezwoda, W ;
Gardin, G ;
Gudgeon, A ;
Morgan, M ;
Fornasiero, A ;
Hoffmann, W ;
Michel, J ;
Hatschek, T ;
Tjabbes, T ;
Chaudri, HA ;
Hornberger, U ;
Trunet, PF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (02) :453-461