Comparison of the electromyographic recruitment of the posterior oblique sling muscles during prone hip extension among three different shoulder positions

被引:11
作者
Ha, Sung-Min [1 ]
Jeon, In-Cheol [2 ]
机构
[1] Sangji Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Wonju, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[2] Hoseo Univ, Coll Life & Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, 20 Hoseo Ro 79 Beon Gil, Asan 34199, Chungcheongnam, South Korea
关键词
Gluteus maximus; posterior oblique sling; prone hip extension; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS; LOW-BACK; KINEMATICS; PAIN; ACTIVATION; EXERCISES; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2019.1675206
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: We examined the effects of three different shoulder positions on the electromyography (EMG) activity of the posterior oblique sling and pelvic rotational angle during right prone hip extension (PHE). Methods: Fifteen healthy males (mean age, 25.4???1.2?years) participated in this study. Three different left shoulder positions (0?, 90?, 125? of abduction) were assessed during right PHE. Surface EMG signals were recorded for the left latissimus dorsi, left middle trapezius, left lower trapezius, lumbar multifidus, right gluteus maximus, and right biceps femoris. An electromagnetic tracking motion analysis device was used to monitor compensatory pelvic rotation during right PHE. Significant differences in muscle activity and pelvic rotation angle among the three different shoulder abductions were assessed using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post hoc test. Results: The bilateral multifidus and right gluteus maximus EMG amplitudes increased with increasing shoulder abduction angle during PHE (p(adj) < 0.01). The degree of pelvic rotation during PHE decreased with increasing shoulder abduction angle (p(adj) < 0.01). Conclusions: We found that PHE with 125? of left shoulder abduction increased the selective activation of lumbopelvic stabilizing muscles such as the multifidus and gluteus maximus.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1050
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment SyndromesE-Book
[3]   Electromyographical analysis of selected lower extremity muscles during 5 unilateral weight-bearing exercises [J].
Ayotte, Norman W. ;
Stetts, Deborah M. ;
Keenan, Geoffrey ;
Greenway, Elizabeth H. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 37 (02) :48-55
[4]  
BERGMARK A, 1989, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V60, P3
[5]   Electromyographic analysis of hip rehabilitation exercises in a group of healthy subjects [J].
Bolgla, LA ;
Uhl, TL .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 35 (08) :487-494
[6]   Comparison of scapular kinematics between elevation and lowering of the arm in the scapular plane [J].
Borstad, JD ;
Ludewig, PM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (9-10) :650-659
[7]  
Bruno P., 2008, Clinical Chiropractic, V11, P4, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CLCH.2008.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.CICH.2008.01.001]
[8]   Spinal kinematics and trunk muscle activity in cyclists: a comparison between healthy controls and non-specific chronic low back pain subjects - a pilot investigation [J].
Burnett, AF ;
Cornelius, MW ;
Dankaerts, W ;
O'Sullivan, PB .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2004, 9 (04) :211-219
[9]  
Comerford M., 2012, Kinetic Control: The management of Uncontrolled Movement
[10]  
Cram J.R., 2010, Crams Introduction to Surface Electromyography