Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading

被引:37
作者
Lavender, SA
Shakeel, K
Andersson, GBJ
Thomas, JS
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Kinesiol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
back support; ergonomics; lifting belt; low back pain; sudden loading;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200006150-00018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Ten men and eight women participated in a repeated-measures experiment in which sudden loads were applied unexpectedly to a container held in the hands, Three independent variables were investigated: lifting belt use, preload, and load symmetry. Objectives. To determine whether a lifting belt would help protect the spine in sudden symmetric and asymmetric loading situations. Summary of Background Data. Unexpected loading events have long been associated with the onset of back pain. Based on work showing that lifting belts restrict motion the torso, the hypothesis was that a lifting belt would stiffen the spine, thereby protecting its supporting tissues. Methods. A weight, equal to 7.5% of the subjects' trunk extension force, was allowed to fall 1 m before the bottom of a box held by blindfolded subjects was pulled. Kinetic and kinematic data, obtained from two force plates and a magnetic motion measurement system, were used in a three-dimensional, dynamic, linked-segment biomechanical model to calculate spine moments. Electromyogram data were simultaneously obtained from eight trunk muscles. Results. The belt reduced the forward bending of the spine during the symmetric loadings. In the men, the belt also reduced the forward flexion moment acting on the spine. The belt restricted lateral bending in the women and men, when the box was preloaded, The peak electromyogram amplitudes from posterior contralateral erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles increased during the asymmetric loadings, whereas three ipsilateral muscles were less active. Conclusions. The conflicting moment and electromyographic results, combined with the influence of load symmetry, preload, and gender make the benefits of the lifting belt difficult to delineate. Although the data support the hypothesis that the belt stiffens the torso's response to sudden loading, the effects are small, and considerable individual differences exist. The findings show that during unexpected sudden loading, a belt may reduce the net external moment loading. At the same time the belt appears to alter the muscle response strategy so that the belt's overall effect on an individual's safety is hard to determine.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1577
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   3-DIMENSIONAL COORDINATE DATA-PROCESSING IN HUMAN MOTION ANALYSIS [J].
ANDRIACCHI, TP ;
HAMPTON, SJ ;
SCHULTZ, AB ;
GALANTE, JO .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1979, 101 (04) :279-283
[2]   A SEQUENCE OF POSTURAL MOVEMENTS PRECEDES VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT [J].
BOUISSET, S ;
ZATTARA, M .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1981, 22 (03) :263-270
[3]  
BRANCH TP, 1991, 37 ANN M ORTH RES SO, P663
[4]   MOTOR-RESPONSES IN THE HUMAN TRUNK DUE TO LOAD PERTURBATIONS [J].
CARLSON, H ;
NILSSON, J ;
THORSTENSSON, A ;
ZOMLEFER, MR .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 111 (02) :221-223
[5]  
Chaffin D.B., 1991, OCCUPATIONAL BIOMECH
[6]   PROPERTIES OF POSTURAL ADJUSTMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH RAPID ARM MOVEMENTS [J].
CORDO, PJ ;
NASHNER, LM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 47 (02) :287-382
[7]  
CRESSWELL AG, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V98, P336
[8]   THE EVALUATION OF A PRACTICAL BIOMECHANICAL MODEL ESTIMATING LUMBAR MOMENTS IN OCCUPATIONAL ACTIVITIES [J].
DELOOZE, MP ;
KINGMA, I ;
THUNNISSEN, W ;
VANWIJK, MJ ;
TOUSSAINT, HM .
ERGONOMICS, 1994, 37 (09) :1495-1502
[9]   PROPERTIES OF BODY SEGMENTS BASED ON SIZE AND WEIGHT [J].
DEMPSTER, WT ;
GAUGHRAN, GR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1967, 120 (01) :33-&
[10]   Biomechanical assessment of lifting dynamics, muscle activity and spinal loads while using three different styles of lifting belt [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS ;
Davis, KG .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 12 (02) :107-115