Pathological staging and biochemical recurrence after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in combination with radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: Results of a phase II study

被引:40
作者
Cookson, MS [1 ]
Sogani, PC [1 ]
Russo, P [1 ]
Sheinfeld, J [1 ]
Herr, H [1 ]
Dalbagni, G [1 ]
Reuter, VE [1 ]
Begg, CB [1 ]
Fair, WR [1 ]
机构
[1] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR, DIV UROL, DEPT SURG, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 79卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; prostatectomy; androgen deprivation therapy; biochemical recurrence;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00022.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the pathological staging and biochemical progression-free survival (assessed using serum prostate-specific antigen level) of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Patients and methods A prospective study was carried out on 69 patients with localized prostate cancer who were enrolled in a trial of 3 months of ADT followed by RRP (group 1). These patients were compared with 72 patients matched for age and clinical stage who declined ADT therapy and had RRP concurrently (group 2). Assignment to the individual treatment groups was thus determined by the patient's preference and not the physician's selection. Pathological staging and biochemical progression-free recurrence were compared between the groups. Results The rate of organ-confined (pT2) tumours was 74% in group 1 and 49% in group 2 (P<0.01), and the rate of margin-negative tumours was 87% in group 1 and 64% in group 2 (P<0.01). Within a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no significant difference in biochemical failure between the groups (P=0.37). Patients with pT2 disease, regardless of treatment, had similar biochemical failure rates. In the patients with margin-positive disease, there was a significantly higher biochemical failure rate in group 1(P=0.02). Conclusions The rates of organ- and specimen-confined disease were higher among the patients treated with ADT. The preliminary follow-up suggested that patients with pT2 disease after ADT have a biochemical progression-free recurrence rate similar to pT2 patients treated with RRP alone, Additionally, high biochemical failure rates in patients with margin-positive disease after ADT may identify a subset of more biologically aggressive tumours in need of early adjuvant treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 438
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combination of adjuvant radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy in high risk prostate cancer patients - results from retrospective analysis
    Omrcen, Tomislav
    Hrepic, Dario
    Jelavic, Tihana Boraska
    Vrdoljak, Eduard
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (04): : 1061 - 1067
  • [42] Predicting factors for progression to castration resistance prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy
    Takeshi Hashimoto
    Jun Nakashima
    Takeshi Kashima
    Yuri Yamaguchi
    Naoya Satake
    Yoshihiro Nakagami
    Kazunori Namiki
    Yoshio Ohno
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 25 : 1704 - 1710
  • [43] Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Han, M
    Partin, AW
    Piantadosi, S
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) : 416 - 419
  • [44] Evaluation of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy
    Yamamoto, Yutaka
    Kiba, Keisuke
    Yoshikawa, Motokiyo
    Hirayama, Akihide
    Kunikata, Seiji
    Uemura, Hirotsugu
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2016, 8 : 225 - 231
  • [45] Low rates of androgen deprivation therapy use with salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Yang, David D.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Nezolosky, Michelle D.
    Labe, Shelby A.
    Vastola, Marie E.
    Boldbaatar, Ninjin
    King, Martin T.
    Martin, Neil E.
    Orio, Peter F., III
    Choueiri, Tni K.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Den, Robert B.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (09) : 542.e25 - 542.e32
  • [46] Use of additional treatment for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation, or watchful waiting
    Berge, Viktor
    Thompson, Trevor
    Blackman, Donald
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 41 (03): : 198 - 203
  • [47] No residual tumor in a radical prostatectomy specimen after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Noguchi, M
    Noda, S
    Nakashima, O
    Kojiro, M
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2002, 9 (05) : 1075 - 1080
  • [48] The impact of multifocal perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence and timing of adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy
    Sun, Guangxi
    Huang, Rui
    Zhang, Xingming
    Shen, Pengfei
    Gong, Jing
    Zhao, Jinge
    Liu, Jiandong
    Tang, Qidun
    Shu, Kunpeng
    Yin, Xiaoxue
    Chen, Ni
    Zeng, Hao
    PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (12) : 1279 - 1287
  • [49] Preoperative Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Delayed Biochemical Recurrence in High-Risk Disease
    Pal, Sumanta K.
    Ruel, Nora
    Vogelzang, Nicholas
    Chang, Mark
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Jones, Jeremy O.
    Yuh, Bertram
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2014, 12 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [50] Combination of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Salvage Radiotherapy versus Salvage Radiotherapy Alone for Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy
    Yoo, Sangjun
    You, Dalsan
    Kim, Young Seok
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 99 (04) : 406 - 413