Effect of particle size on magnesite flotation based on kinetic studies and machine learning simulation

被引:34
作者
Fu, Yafeng [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bin [2 ]
Ma, Yingqiang [3 ]
Sun, Qianyu [2 ,4 ]
Yao, Jin [2 ]
Fu, Wenbiao [5 ]
Yin, Wanzhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Min Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sch Resources & Civil Engn, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[3] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Zijin Min, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Shanxi Transportat New Technol Dev Co Ltd, Taiyuan 030006, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnesite; Froth flotation; Selectivity index; Kinetic study; Machine learning; FROTH FLOTATION; ENTRAINMENT; SEPARATION; ADSORPTION; EFFICIENCY; SCHEELITE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2020.08.054
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This research focused on the effect of particle size and flotation time on magnesite flotation, and the flotation performance of various size fractions were predicted by a machine learning (ML) method. Four kinetic models were used to lit the recovery of MgO and SiO2 in various size fractions of magnesite flotation. The results demonstrated that the flotation of magnesite exhibits good agreement with the classical first-order kinetic model. Besides, the effect of various particle sizes on MgO recovery and selectivity index was predicted by ML method. It was shown that the proposed ML model could accurately reproduce the effects of particle size and flotation time on magnesite flotation performance. Furthermore, the developed model revealed that the optimal mean size range for magnesite flotation is 30 to 48 mu m. Therefore, this paper is of great significance to the application of ML methods in the prediction of various magnesite size flotation performance. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 495
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Flotation characteristics and flotation kinetics of fine wolframite [J].
Ai, Guanghua ;
Yang, Xiuli ;
Li, Xiaobo .
POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 305 :377-381
[2]  
AL-THYABAT S., 2008, J CHINA U MINING TEC, V18, P418, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60087-5
[3]   An evaluation of machine learning and artificial intelligence models for predicting the flotation behavior of fine high-ash coal [J].
Ali, Danish ;
Hayat, Muhammad Badar ;
Alagha, Lana ;
Molatlhegi, Ontlametse Kenneth .
ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (12) :3493-3506
[4]   A comparison of the predictability of batch flotation kinetic models [J].
Alvarez-Silva, M. ;
Vinnett, L. ;
Langlois, R. ;
Waters, K. E. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2016, 99 :142-150
[5]   A review on machine learning algorithms to predict daylighting inside buildings [J].
Ayoub, Mohammed .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 202 :249-275
[6]   Effect of different reagent regime on the kinetic model and recovery in gilsonite flotation [J].
Bahrami, Ataallah ;
Kazemi, Fatemeh ;
Ghorbani, Yousef .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2019, 8 (05) :4498-4509
[7]   Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Fijani, Elham ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari ;
Tziritis, Evangelos .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 599 :20-31
[8]   Effects of size distribution on flotation kinetics of Turkish sphalerite [J].
Bayat, O ;
Ucurum, M ;
Poole, C .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION C-MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY, 2004, 113 (01) :53-59
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]   Estimation of flotation kinetic parameters by considering interactions of the operating variables [J].
Çilek, EC .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2004, 17 (01) :81-85