SOCIAL MOBILITY IN FIVE AFRICAN COUNTRIES

被引:29
作者
Bossuroy, Thomas [1 ]
Cogneau, Denis [2 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC USA
[2] Paris Sch Econ IRD, Paris, France
关键词
J62; O15; N37; Africa; colonization; dualism; inequality; intergenerational mobility; INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY; INEQUALITY; UNEMPLOYMENT; CONVERGENCE; OPPORTUNITY; EDUCATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/roiw.12037
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper conceptualizes intergenerational occupational mobility between the farm and non-farm sectors in five African countries, measures it using nationally representative household survey data, and analyzes its determinants through a comparative method based on pooled logit regressions. We first analyze intergenerational gross mobility. Until the end of the 1980s, intergenerational flows toward the non-farm sector are high in Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea, flows toward the farm sector are more often observed in Ghana and Uganda, and Madagascar displays less mobility in either direction. The pace of change in occupational structures and the magnitude of labor income dualism between the farm and non-farm sectors appear to explain those differences. We then net out structural change across generations and establish the first measurement of intergenerational net mobility in those five African countries. Ghana and Uganda stand out as relatively more fluid societies. Cote d'Ivoire and Guinea come next while Madagascar shows a particularly high reproduction of occupations. Educational mobility accounts for the Madagascar exception to a large extent, but not for the differences between the other countries. Spatial dualism of employment, i.e. the geographic segregation of farm and non-farm jobs, accounts for most of those remaining differences. We argue that the main determinants of intergenerational mobility, namely income and employment dualisms, likely reflect a historical legacy of different colonial administrations.
引用
收藏
页码:S84 / S110
页数:27
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INT TRADE CLIMATE CH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, World development report 2006: Equity and development
[3]  
Austin G., 2010, International Development Policy| Revue internationale de politique de developpement, P11
[4]  
Behrman Jere R., 2004, ECONOMIA, V2, P1
[5]   THE EXPANSION OF PRIMARY-EDUCATION, 1870-1940 - TRENDS AND ISSUES [J].
BENAVOT, A ;
RIDDLE, P .
SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 1988, 61 (03) :191-210
[6]  
Boone C., 2003, POLITICAL TOPOGRAPHI
[7]   Vive la difference? Intergenerational Mobility in France and the United States during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries [J].
Bourdieu, Jerome ;
Ferrie, Joseph P. ;
Kesztenbaum, Lionel .
JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY HISTORY, 2009, 39 (04) :523-557
[8]   Inequality of opportunity in Brazil [J].
Bourguignon, Francois ;
Ferreira, Francisco H. G. ;
Menendez, Marta .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2007, 53 (04) :585-618
[9]   Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: Models and evidence for five cohorts of American males [J].
Cameron, SV ;
Heckman, JJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1998, 106 (02) :262-333
[10]   INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY IN MODERN CHINA [J].
CHENG, Y ;
DAI, JZ .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 11 (01) :17-35