Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Size characterization and quantification of silver nanoparticles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
    Bolea, E.
    Jimenez-Lamana, J.
    Laborda, F.
    Castillo, J. R.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 401 (09) : 2723 - 2732
  • [42] Resonance light scattering (RLS) detection of nanoparticle separations in a microelectrical field-flow fractionation system
    Graff, M
    Frazier, AB
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 5 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [43] Carboxymethylation of corn starch and characterization using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation coupled with multiangle light scattering
    Lee, Seungho
    Kim, Sun Tae
    Pant, Bhoj Raj
    Kwen, Hai Doo
    Song, Hyun Hoon
    Lee, Sung Kwang
    Nehete, Sachin Vilas
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2010, 1217 (27) : 4623 - 4628
  • [44] Optimization of Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    Qureshi, Rashid N.
    Kok, Wim Th
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 29 (01) : 76 - +
  • [45] Insights into the internal structures of nanogels using a versatile asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation method
    Niezabitowska, Edyta
    Town, Adam R.
    Sabagh, Bassem
    Moctezuma, Marissa D. Morales
    Kearns, Victoria R.
    Spain, Sebastian G.
    Rannard, Steve P.
    McDonald, Tom O.
    NANOSCALE ADVANCES, 2020, 2 (10): : 4713 - 4721
  • [46] The role of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation in drug development - From size separation to advanced characterization
    Richter, Klaus
    Reichel, Angelika
    Vezocnik, Valerija
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2025, 1739
  • [47] Capabilities of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering to detect carbon nanotubes in soot and soil
    Gogos, Alexander
    Kaegi, Ralf
    Zenobi, Renato
    Bucheli, Thomas D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2014, 1 (06) : 584 - 594
  • [48] First steps towards a generic sample preparation scheme for inorganic engineered nanoparticles in a complex matrix for detection, characterization, and quantification by asymmetric flow-field flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering and ICP-MS
    Wagner, S.
    Legros, S.
    Loeschner, K.
    Liu, J.
    Navratilova, J.
    Grombe, R.
    Linsinger, T. P. J.
    Larsen, E. H.
    von der Kammer, F.
    Hofmann, T.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2015, 30 (06) : 1286 - 1296
  • [49] Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering and quasi-elastic light scattering for characterization of polymersomes: comparison with classical techniques
    Till, Ugo
    Gaucher-Delmas, Mireille
    Saint-Aguet, Pascale
    Hamon, Glenn
    Marty, Jean-Daniel
    Chassenieux, Christophe
    Payre, Bruno
    Goudouneche, Dominique
    Mingotaud, Anne-Francoise
    Violleau, Frederic
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 406 (30) : 7841 - 7853
  • [50] Detection and characterization of silver nanoparticles in chicken meat by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with detection by conventional or single particle ICP-MS
    Loeschner, Katrin
    Navratilova, Jana
    Kobler, Carsten
    Molhave, Kristian
    Wagner, Stephan
    von der Kammer, Frank
    Larsen, Erik H.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 405 (25) : 8185 - 8195