Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation for the characterization of globule size distribution in complex formulations: A cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion case
    Qu, Haiou
    Wang, Jiang
    Wu, Yong
    Zheng, Jiwen
    Krishnaiah, Yellela S. R.
    Absar, Mohammad
    Choi, Stephanie
    Ashraf, Muhammad
    Cruz, Celia N.
    Xu, Xiaoming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2018, 538 (1-2) : 215 - 222
  • [32] Quantification of Nanoparticles via Flow Injection Analysis Using Asymmetric Flow Field -flow Fractionation (AF4)
    Itabashi, Daisuke
    Mizukami, Kazumi
    TETSU TO HAGANE-JOURNAL OF THE IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, 2023, 109 (07): : 15 - 22
  • [33] Detection of nanocellulose in commercial products and its size characterization using asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation
    Ruiz-Palomero, Celia
    Laura Soriano, M.
    Valcarcel, Miguel
    MICROCHIMICA ACTA, 2017, 184 (04) : 1069 - 1076
  • [34] Optimization and evaluation of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation of silver nanoparticles
    Loeschner, Katrin
    Navratilova, Jana
    Legros, Samuel
    Wagner, Stephan
    Grombe, Ringo
    Snell, James
    von der Kammer, Frank
    Larsen, Erik H.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1272 : 116 - 125
  • [35] Optimization of hyphenated asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation for the analysis of silver nanoparticles in aqueous solutions
    Geissler, Felix
    Martinez-Cabanas, Maria
    Lodeiro, Pablo
    Achterberg, Eric P.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 413 (27) : 6889 - 6904
  • [36] Comparison of on-line detectors for field flow fractionation analysis of nanomaterials
    Bednar, A. J.
    Poda, A. R.
    Mitrano, D. M.
    Kennedy, A. J.
    Gray, E. P.
    Ranville, J. F.
    Hayes, C. A.
    Crocker, F. H.
    Steevens, J. A.
    TALANTA, 2013, 104 : 140 - 148
  • [37] Limitations of Nanoparticles Size Characterization by Asymmetric Flow Field-Fractionation Coupled with Online Dynamic Light Scattering
    Giorgi, Francesco
    Curran, Judith M.
    Gilliland, Douglas
    La Spina, Rita
    Whelan, Maurice
    Patterson, Eann A.
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2021, 84 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [38] Fractionation and characterization of gold nanoparticles in aqueous solution: asymmetric-flow field flow fractionation with MALS, DLS, and UV-Vis detection
    Cho, Tae Joon
    Hackley, Vincent A.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 398 (05) : 2003 - 2018
  • [39] Quantification of Nanoparticles via Flow Injection Analysis Using Asymmetric Flow Field-flow Fractionation (AF4)
    Itabashi, Daisuke
    Mizukami, Kazumi
    ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 62 (05) : 860 - 866
  • [40] Characterization and quantification of silver nanoparticles in nutraceuticals and beverages by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
    Ramos, K.
    Ramos, L.
    Camara, C.
    Gomez-Gomez, M. M.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2014, 1371 : 227 - 236