Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preparation of tailor-made supported catalysts using asymmetric flow field flow fractionation and their application in hydrogenation
    Baumgard, Jens
    Pohl, Marga-Martina
    Kragl, Udo
    Steinfeldt, Norbert
    NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS, 2014, 3 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [22] Colloidal Mechanisms of Gold Nanoparticle Loss in Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    Jochem, Aljosha-Rakim
    Ankah, Genesis Ngwa
    Meyer, Lars-Arne
    Elsenberg, Stephan
    Johann, Christoph
    Kraus, Tobias
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 88 (20) : 10065 - 10073
  • [23] Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation: A Powerful Method for Polymer Characterization
    Podzimek, Stepan
    Lebedat, Petr
    Johann, Christoph
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 27 (01) : 62 - +
  • [24] Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation: A Powerful Method for Polymer Characterization
    Podzimek, Stepan
    Lebeda, Petr
    Johann, Christoph
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2009, : 62 - 66
  • [25] A method based on asymmetric flow field flow fractionation hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the monitoring of platinum nanoparticles in water samples
    Sanchez-Cachero, Armando
    Lopez-Sanz, Sara
    Farinas, Nuria Rodriguez
    Rios, Angel
    Martin-Doimeadios, Rosa del Carmen Rodriguez
    TALANTA, 2021, 222
  • [26] Importance of material matching in the calibration of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation: material specificity and nanoparticle surface coating effects on retention time
    Qu, Haiou
    Quevedo, Ivan R.
    Linder, Sean W.
    Fong, Andrew
    Mudalige, Thilak K.
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (10)
  • [27] Limitations of Nanoparticles Size Characterization by Asymmetric Flow Field‑Fractionation Coupled with Online Dynamic Light Scattering
    Francesco Giorgi
    Judith M. Curran
    Douglas Gilliland
    Rita La Spina
    Maurice Whelan
    Eann A. Patterson
    Chromatographia, 2021, 84 : 199 - 206
  • [28] Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation for the investigation of caseins cross-linked by microbial transglutaminase
    Abbate, Raffaele Andrea
    Raak, Norbert
    Boye, Susanne
    Janke, Andreas
    Rohm, Harald
    Jaros, Doris
    Lederer, Albena
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2019, 92 : 117 - 124
  • [29] Optimisation of ambient and high temperature asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with dual/multi-angle light scattering and infrared/refractive index detection
    Otte, T.
    Bruell, R.
    Macko, T.
    Pasch, H.
    Klein, T.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2010, 1217 (05) : 722 - 730
  • [30] Simple Functionalization Strategies for Enhancing Nanoparticle Separation and Recovery with Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation
    Mudalige, Thilak K.
    Qu, Haiou
    Sanchez-Pomales, Germane
    Sisco, Patrick N.
    Linder, Sean W.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 (03) : 1764 - 1772