Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Detection of nanoplastics in food by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering: possibilities, challenges and analytical limitations
    Manuel Correia
    Katrin Loeschner
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2018, 410 : 5603 - 5615
  • [12] Characterization of aggregates of surface modified fullerenes by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection
    Astefanei, Alina
    Kok, Wim Th.
    Bauerlein, Patrick
    Nunez, Oscar
    Teresa Galceran, Maria
    de Voogt, Pim
    Schoenmakers, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1408 : 197 - 206
  • [13] Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection for the analysis of structured nanoparticles
    Zattoni, Andrea
    Rambaldi, Diana Cristina
    Reschiglian, Pierluigi
    Melucci, Manuela
    Krol, Silke
    Coto Garcia, Ana Maria
    Sanz-Medel, Alfredo
    Roessner, Dierk
    Johann, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (52) : 9106 - 9112
  • [14] Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation methods for virus purification
    Eskelin, Katri
    Lampi, Mirka
    Meier, Florian
    Moldenhauer, Evelin
    Bamford, Dennis H.
    Oksanen, Hanna M.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1469 : 108 - 119
  • [15] Analysis of plant ribosomes with asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation
    Leena Pitkänen
    Päivi Tuomainen
    Katri Eskelin
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2014, 406 : 1629 - 1637
  • [16] Analysis of plant ribosomes with asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation
    Pitkanen, Leena
    Tuomainen, Paivi
    Eskelin, Katri
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 406 (06) : 1629 - 1637
  • [17] Optimisation of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation for the characterisation of nanoparticles in coated polydisperse TiO2 with applications in food and feed
    Omar, J.
    Boix, A.
    Kerckhove, G.
    von Holst, C.
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 33 (12): : 1775 - 1784
  • [18] Sample loss in asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry of silver nanoparticles
    Soetebier, Carina A.
    Bierkandt, Frank S.
    Rades, Steffi
    Jakubowski, Norbert
    Panne, Ulrich
    Weidner, Steffen M.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2015, 30 (10) : 2214 - 2222
  • [19] Molar Mass Characterization of Crude Lignosulfonates by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation
    Sulaeva, Irina
    Vejdovszky, Philipp
    Henniges, Ute
    Mahler, Arnulf Kai
    Rosenau, Thomas
    Potthast, Antje
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (01) : 216 - 223
  • [20] Quantitative characterization of silica nanoparticles by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation coupled with online multiangle light scattering and ICP-MS/MS detection
    Aureli, Federica
    D'Amato, Marilena
    Raggi, Andrea
    Cubadda, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2015, 30 (06) : 1266 - 1273