How to Enhance the Role of Science in European Union Policy Making and Implementation: The Case of Agricultural Impacts on Drinking Water Quality

被引:12
作者
Glavan, Matjaz [1 ]
Zeleznikar, Spela [1 ]
Velthof, Gerard [2 ]
Boekhold, Sandra [3 ]
Langaas, Sindre [4 ]
Pintar, Marina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Res, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
drinking water; agriculture; EU policy; governance; integrated scientific support; water quality; nitrates; pesticides; AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL SCHEMES; RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; EU; SUPPORT; POLITICS; CLIMATE; PARTICIPATION; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.3390/w11030492
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Throughout the European Union (EU), high concentrations of nitrates and pesticides are among the major polluting components of drinking water and have potential long-term impacts on the environment and human health. Many research projects co-funded by the European Commission have been carried out, but the results often do not influence policy making and implementation to the extent that is duly justified. This paper assesses several issues and barriers that weaken the role of science in EU policy making and EU policy implementation in the case of agricultural impacts on drinking water quality. It then proposes improvements and solutions to strengthen the role of science in this process. The analysis is conceptual but supported empirically by a desk study, a workshop, and complementary individual interviews, mostly with representatives of organizations working at the EU level. The results indicate that perceived barriers are mostly observed on the national or regional level and are connected with a lack of political will, scarce instruction on the legislation implementation process, and a lack of funding opportunities for science to be included in policy making and further EU policy implementation. In response to that, we suggest translating scientific knowledge on technological, practical or environmental changes and using dissemination techniques for specific audiences and in local languages. Further, the relationship between data, information and decision making needs to change by implementing monitoring in real-time, which will allow for the quick adaptation of strategies. In addition, we suggest project clustering (science, policy, stakeholders, and citizens) to make science and research more connected to current policy challenges and stakeholder needs along with citizen involvement with an aim of establishing sustainable long-term relationships and communication flows.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed
    Anglade, J.
    Billen, G.
    Gamier, J.
    Makridis, T.
    Puech, T.
    Tittel, C.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 139 : 82 - 92
  • [2] Obstacles to data access for research related to climate and water: Implications for science and EU policy-making
    Beniston, Martin
    Stoffel, Markus
    Harding, Richard
    Kernan, Martin
    Ludwig, Ralf
    Moors, Eddy
    Samuels, Paul
    Tockner, Klement
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2012, 17 : 41 - 48
  • [3] What are political leaders' environmental intentions? The impact of social identification processes and macro-economic conditions
    Biscotti, Anna Maria
    D'Amico, Eugenio
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 129 : 152 - 160
  • [4] Rethinking policy 'impact': Four models of research-policy relations
    Boswell C.
    Smith K.
    [J]. Palgrave Communications, 3 (1)
  • [5] Bressers H., 1994, ENVIRON POLIT, V3, P197, DOI [10.1080/09644019408414172, DOI 10.1080/09644019408414172]
  • [6] Priority water research questions as determined by UK practitioners and policy makers
    Brown, L. E.
    Mitchell, G.
    Holden, J.
    Folkard, A.
    Wright, N.
    Beharry-Borg, N.
    Berry, G.
    Brierley, B.
    Chapman, P.
    Clarke, S. J.
    Cotton, L.
    Dobson, M.
    Dollar, E.
    Fletcher, M.
    Foster, J.
    Hanlon, A.
    Hildon, S.
    Hiley, P.
    Hillis, P.
    Hoseason, J.
    Johnston, K.
    Kay, P.
    McDonald, A.
    Parrott, A.
    Powell, A.
    Slack, R. J.
    Sleigh, A.
    Spray, C.
    Tapley, K.
    Underhill, R.
    Woulds, C.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 409 (02) : 256 - 266
  • [7] Implementation of the EU Nitrates Directive in the Republic of Ireland - A view from the farm
    Buckley, Cathal
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 : 29 - 36
  • [8] Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile
    Budds, Jessica
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2009, 40 (03) : 418 - 430
  • [9] Shaping science policy in Europe
    Celis, Julio E.
    Mariano Gago, Jose
    [J]. MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2014, 8 (03) : 447 - 457
  • [10] CORDIS, COMM RES DEV INF SER