Why Do Episodic Volunteers Stay in FLOSS Communities?

被引:15
作者
Barcomb, Ann [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Stol, Klaas-Jan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Riehle, Dirk
Fitzgerald, Brian [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Open Source Res Grp, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Lero, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Cork, Ireland
[4] Univ Limerick, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Limerick, Ireland
来源
2019 IEEE/ACM 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2019) | 2019年
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
community management; episodic volunteering; open source software; volunteer management; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; ROLE-IDENTITY; MOTIVATION; ISSUES; RETENTION; PROJECTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/ICSE.2019.00100
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Successful Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects incorporate both habitual and infrequent, or episodic, contributors. Using the concept of episodic volunteering (EV) from the general volunteering literature, we derive a model consisting of five key constructs that we hypothesize affect episodic volunteers' retention in FLOSS communities. To evaluate the model we conducted a survey with over 100 FLOSS episodic volunteers. We observe that three of our model constructs (social norms, satisfaction and community commitment) are all positively associated with volunteers' intention to remain, while the two other constructs (psychological sense of community and contributor benefit motivations) are not. Furthermore, exploratory clustering on unobserved heterogeneity suggests that there are four distinct categories of volunteers: satisfied, classic, social and obligated. Based on our findings, we offer suggestions for projects to incorporate and manage episodic volunteers, so as to better leverage this type of contributors and potentially improve projects' sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 959
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion [J].
Ab Hamid, M. R. ;
Sami, W. ;
Sidek, M. H. Mohmad .
1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED & INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS 2017 (ICOAIMS 2017), 2017, 890
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TECH REP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1023948027200, 10.1023/A:1023948027200]
[5]  
Arjona-Reina L., 2014, FLOSS2013 FREE LIBRE
[6]  
Barcomb A., 2018, IEEE T SOFTWARE ENG
[7]  
Barcomb A., 2015, 11 INT C OP SOURC SY
[8]  
Barcomb A., 2018, WHY DO EPISODIC VOLU
[9]  
Bosnjak M, 2003, SOC SCI COMPUT REV, V21, P208, DOI [10.1177/0894439303021002006, 10.1177/0894439303251569]
[10]   ROLE-IDENTITY SALIENCE [J].
CALLERO, PL .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1985, 48 (03) :203-215