Do green bonds have environmental benefits?

被引:111
作者
Chang, Lei [1 ]
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad [2 ]
Chen, Huangen [3 ]
Mohsin, Muhammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Tokai Univ, TOKAI Res Inst Environm & Sustainabil TRIES, Sch Global Studies, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Fac Business Adm, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Ecological footprint; Green bonds; Green finance; Environmental quality; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; COUNTRIES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106356
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research explores the asymmetric green finance-environmental quality nexus in the top 10 countries that support green finance. Green bonds and ecological footprint are used as proxies for green finance and envi-ronmental quality, respectively. Past studies employed panel data approaches, yielding typical results regarding the relationship between green finance and the environment, even though many countries did not establish such a correlation on their own. This study, on the contrary, adopts a unique Quantile-on-Quantile technique, which allows researchers to independently investigate time-series dependence in each economy by providing global but country-specific information on the link between the variables. According to assessments, green financing im-proves environmental quality in 8 out of 10 selected economies at particular quantiles of data distribution. However, two countries yielded mixed results. Moreover, the results reveal that the asymmetry between our variables varies by nation, stressing the importance of authorities' paying close attention while adopting green finance and ecological sustainability policies. This study could help identify priorities and gaps that must be addressed to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [41] Su D., 2018, Journal of Financial Research, V40, P123, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11356-021-15587-7
  • [42] Dynamic spillover effects among green bond, renewable energy stocks and carbon markets during COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for hedging and investments strategies
    Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
    Abakah, Emmanuel Joel Aikins
    Gabauer, David
    Dwumfour, Richard Adjei
    [J]. GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 51
  • [43] Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter?
    Tolliver, Clarence
    Keeley, Alexander Ryota
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 157
  • [44] UNESCAP, 2013, GREEN GROWTH IND PRA
  • [45] Wackernagel Mathis, 1998, Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth, V9
  • [46] The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies
    Wang, Yao
    Zhi, Qiang
    [J]. CLEAN ENERGY FOR CLEAN CITY: CUE 2016 - APPLIED ENERGY SYMPOSIUM AND FORUM: LOW-CARBON CITIES AND URBAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 104 : 311 - 316
  • [47] Wen Huwei, 2023, ENERG J, V44
  • [48] Simulating spatiotemporal land use change in middle and high latitude regions using multiscale fusion and cellular automata: The case of Northeast China
    Wu, Xia
    Lin, An-Qi
    Li, Yan
    Wu, Hao
    Cen, Lu-Yu
    Liu, He
    Song, Dan-Xia
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 133
  • [49] Quantile cointegrating regression
    Xiao, Zhijie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2009, 150 (02) : 248 - 260
  • [50] Role of solar-based renewable energy in mitigating CO2 emissions: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile estimation
    Yu, Jinna
    Tang, Yuk Ming
    Chau, Ka Yin
    Nazar, Raima
    Ali, Sajid
    Iqbal, Wasim
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 182 : 216 - 226