Do green bonds have environmental benefits?

被引:111
作者
Chang, Lei [1 ]
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad [2 ]
Chen, Huangen [3 ]
Mohsin, Muhammad [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Tokai Univ, TOKAI Res Inst Environm & Sustainabil TRIES, Sch Global Studies, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Fac Business Adm, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Ecological footprint; Green bonds; Green finance; Environmental quality; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; COUNTRIES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106356
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research explores the asymmetric green finance-environmental quality nexus in the top 10 countries that support green finance. Green bonds and ecological footprint are used as proxies for green finance and envi-ronmental quality, respectively. Past studies employed panel data approaches, yielding typical results regarding the relationship between green finance and the environment, even though many countries did not establish such a correlation on their own. This study, on the contrary, adopts a unique Quantile-on-Quantile technique, which allows researchers to independently investigate time-series dependence in each economy by providing global but country-specific information on the link between the variables. According to assessments, green financing im-proves environmental quality in 8 out of 10 selected economies at particular quantiles of data distribution. However, two countries yielded mixed results. Moreover, the results reveal that the asymmetry between our variables varies by nation, stressing the importance of authorities' paying close attention while adopting green finance and ecological sustainability policies. This study could help identify priorities and gaps that must be addressed to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality?
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 83 : 156 - 179
  • [2] Green Field Investment and Environmental Performance: A Case of Selected Nine Developing Countries of Asia
    Adeel-Farooq, Rana Muhammad
    Abu Bakar, Nor Aznin
    Raji, Jimoh Olajide
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 37 (03) : 1085 - 1092
  • [3] Al Mheiri W., 2020, GREEN BONDS MINI REV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Renewable energy statistics 2020
  • [5] Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis
    Charfeddine, Lanouar
    Kahia, Montassar
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 139 : 198 - 213
  • [6] Chen Y., 2019, China Journal of Accounting Studies, V7, P62, DOI [10.1080/21697213.2019.1625578, DOI 10.1080/21697213.2019.1625578]
  • [7] How does the use of industrial robots affect the ecological footprint? International evidence
    Chen, Yang
    Cheng, Liang
    Lee, Chien-Chiang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 198
  • [8] Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework
    Cho, Jin Seo
    Kim, Tae-hwan
    Shin, Yongcheol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 188 (01) : 281 - 300
  • [9] Chu C.K., 1991, STAT SCI, P404, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011586
  • [10] Cioli V., 2021, Int. J. Bus. Manag., DOI [10.5539/ijbm.v16n4p75, DOI 10.5539/IJBM.V16N4P75]