Growth temperature affects inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana

被引:12
|
作者
Antoun, Marlene [1 ]
Ouellet, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
来源
BOTANY-BOTANIQUE | 2013年 / 91卷 / 09期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Arabidopsis; axillary buds; branching; growth; temperature; SHOOT APICAL MERISTEM; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; FLOWERING TIME; PATHWAY; HORMONE; MUTANT; FATE; GENE; APEX;
D O I
10.1139/cjb-2013-0011
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Plants adjust their growth and development to ensure survival under adverse environmental conditions. Nonoptimal growth temperatures can have a major impact on biomass and crop yield. A detailed phenotypic analysis (number and length of rosette and cauline branches, flowers, and buds) in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed that growth temperatures below (12 and 17 degrees C) and above (27 and 32 degrees C) the control 22 degrees C affect branching and flowering. The elongation of internodes on the main stem and of primary branches at cauline leaves is reduced at lower temperatures and increased at higher temperatures. Similar results are observed in plants treated before or after bolting. Our data therefore indicate that plants that have transitioned to the reproductive stage before treatment are slightly less affected by temperature variations than plants that are in their vegetative stage. Our results also suggest that plants need to reach a maximum height (internodes length) before they begin forming floral meristems and that this "maximum height" is dependent on the growth temperature. Plants grown at 17 degrees C show a slightly reduced branching, while those at 27 degrees C show increased branching. This suggests that apical dominance is a temperature-dependent phenomenon. This is, to our knowledge, the first extensive analysis of the effect of temperature on Arabidopsis inflorescence development.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 651
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circumnutation of Arabidopsis thaliana inflorescence stems
    Someya, N
    Niinuma, K
    Kimura, M
    Yamaguchi, I
    Hamamoto, H
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2006, 50 (02) : 287 - 290
  • [2] Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis
    Bradley, D
    Ratcliffe, O
    Vincent, C
    Carpenter, R
    Coen, E
    SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5296) : 80 - 83
  • [3] Modulation of intracellular proline levels affects flowering time and inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis
    Mattioli, Roberto
    Marchese, Daniele
    D'Angeli, Simone
    Altamura, Maria Maddalena
    Costantino, Paolo
    Trovato, Maurizio
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2008, 66 (03) : 277 - 288
  • [4] The inflorescence architecture of Petunia hybrida is modified by the Arabidopsis thaliana Ap2 gene
    Maes, T
    Van Montagu, M
    Gerats, T
    DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS, 1999, 25 (03): : 199 - 208
  • [5] Modulation of intracellular proline levels affects flowering time and inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis
    Roberto Mattioli
    Daniele Marchese
    Simone D’Angeli
    Maria Maddalena Altamura
    Paolo Costantino
    Maurizio Trovato
    Plant Molecular Biology, 2008, 66 : 277 - 288
  • [6] Regenerative xylem in inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis thaliana
    Flaishman, MA
    Loginovsky, K
    Lev-Yadun, S
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2003, 22 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [7] Gravitropic response of inflorescence stems in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Fukaki, H
    Fujisawa, H
    Tasaka, M
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 110 (03) : 933 - 943
  • [8] Regenerative Xylem in Inflorescence Stems of Arabidopsis thaliana
    Moshe A. Flaishman
    Kamelia Loginovsky
    Simcha Lev-Yadun
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2003, 22 : 253 - 258
  • [9] The Arabidopsis compact inflorescence genes:: phase-specific growth regulation and the determination of inflorescence architecture
    Goosey, L
    Sharrock, R
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2001, 26 (05): : 549 - 559
  • [10] Competitive ability not kinship affects growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions
    Masclaux, Frederic
    Hammond, Robert L.
    Meunier, Joel
    Gouhier-Darimont, Caroline
    Keller, Laurent
    Reymond, Philippe
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2010, 185 (01) : 322 - 331