Evaluation of a New Automated Homogeneous PCR Assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for Rapid Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Fecal Specimens

被引:9
|
作者
Hirvonen, Jari J. [1 ]
Mentula, Silja [2 ]
Kaukoranta, Suvi-Sirkku [1 ]
机构
[1] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Clin Microbiol, Vaasa, Finland
[2] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Infect Dis Surveillance & Control, Bacteriol Unit, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
B-POSITIVE STRAINS; TOXIN-B; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; INFECTION; CARRIAGE; IMMUNOASSAYS; RECOGNITION; VIRULENCE; INFANTS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01083-13
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
We evaluated a new automated homogeneous PCR assay to detect toxigenic Clostridium difficile, the GenomEra C. difficile assay (Abacus Diagnostica, Finland), with 310 diarrheal stool specimens and with a collection of 33 known clostridial and nonclostridial isolates. Results were compared with toxigenic culture results, with discrepancies being resolved by the GeneXpert C. difficile PCR assay (Cepheid). Among the 80 toxigenic culture-positive or GeneXpert C. difficile assay-positive fecal specimens, 79 were also positive with the GenomEra C. difficile assay. Additionally, one specimen was positive with the GenomEra assay but negative with the confirmatory methods. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were 98.8% and 99.6%, respectively. With the culture collection, no false-positive or -negative results were observed. The analytical sensitivity of the GenomEra C. difficile assay was approximately 5 CFU per PCR test. The short hands-on (<5 min for 1 to 4 samples) and total turnaround (<1 h) times, together with the high positive and negative predictive values (98.8% and 99.6%, respectively), make the GenomEra C. difficile assay an excellent option for toxigenic C. difficile detection in fecal specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:2908 / 2912
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Clinical Samples: Isothermal tcdB Amplification Coupled to Array-Based Detection
    Hicke, Brian
    Pasko, Chris
    Groves, Benjamin
    Ager, Edward
    Corpuz, Maylene
    Frech, Georges
    Munns, Denton
    Smith, Wendy
    Warcup, Ashley
    Denys, Gerald
    Ledeboer, Nathan A.
    Lindsey, Wes
    Owen, Charles
    Rea, Larry
    Jenison, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (08) : 2681 - 2687
  • [42] Comparison of Nine Commercially Available Clostridium difficile Toxin Detection Assays, a Real-Time PCR Assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a Glutamate Dehydrogenase Detection Assay to Cytotoxin Testing and Cytotoxigenic Culture Methods
    Eastwood, Kerrie
    Else, Patrick
    Charlett, Andre
    Wilcox, Mark
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (10) : 3211 - 3217
  • [43] Comparison of a frozen human foreskin fibroblast cell assay to an enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Strachan, Alastair J.
    Evans, Natalie E.
    Williams, O. Martin
    Spencer, Robert C.
    Greenwood, Rosemary
    Probert, Chris J.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 75 (01) : 42 - 45
  • [44] Evaluation of a New Immunochromatography Test for Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Clostridium difficile Antigen and Toxins
    Samra, Zmira
    Madar-Shapiro, Liora
    Aziz, Mahanez
    Bishara, Jihad
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 15 (07): : 373 - 376
  • [45] Prospective evaluation of the Meridian Illumigene™ loop-mediated amplification assay and the Gen Probe ProGastro™ Cd polymerase chain reaction assay for the direct detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from fecal samples
    Doing, Kirk M.
    Hintz, Marilyn S.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2012, 72 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [46] Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR Assays Using Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Culture for Direct Detection of tcdB from Stool Specimens
    Shin, Bo-Moon
    Mun, Se Jin
    Yoo, Soo Jin
    Kuak, Eun Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (11) : 3765 - 3767
  • [47] Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized adults and the first isolation of C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 in central China
    Yu Zhou
    Liyan Mao
    Jing Yu
    Qun Lin
    Ying Luo
    Xuhui Zhu
    Ziyong Sun
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 19
  • [48] Detection of toxigenic Clostridioides [Clostridium] difficile: Usefulness of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays and a PCR assay on stool samples and stool isolates
    Legaria, Maria C.
    Rollet, Raquel
    Di Martino, Ana
    Castello, Liliana
    Barberis, Claudia
    Rossetti, Maria A.
    Guardati, Maria C.
    Fernandez Canigia, Liliana
    Carloni, Graciela
    Litterio, Mirta
    Rocchi, Marta
    Anchart, Eduardo G.
    Trejon, Fernando M.
    Minnaard, Jessica
    Klajn, Diana
    Predari, Silvia C.
    REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA, 2018, 50 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [49] Comparison of VIDAS CDAB and CDA immunoassay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in a tcdA- tcdB+ C. difficile prevalent area
    Shin, Bo-Moon
    Lee, Eun-Joo
    Kuak, Eun-Young
    Yoo, Soo Jin
    ANAEROBE, 2009, 15 (06) : 266 - 269
  • [50] Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
    Mashock, Michael J.
    Faron, Matthew L.
    Buchan, Blake W.
    Ledeboer, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (10) : 3123 - 3129