Driving and hindering factors for rural electrification in developing countries: Lessons from Bangladesh

被引:40
|
作者
Rahman, Md Mizanur [1 ,3 ]
Paatero, Jukka V. [1 ]
Poudyal, Aditya [2 ]
Lahdelma, Risto [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Energy Technol, FI-0076 Espoo, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Appl Phys, FI-0076 Aalto, Finland
[3] REB, Dhaka 1344, Bangladesh
关键词
Rural electrification; Hindering factors; Master planning; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DETERMINANTS; ELECTRICITY; ASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.100
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rural electrification is essential for bringing about social and economic developments, but the progress is distressingly slow in most developing countries. The Bangladesh Rural Electrification Program (BREP) has been highlighted as a positive case among developing countries, but from 2006 onwards there have been doubts about the program's chances of success. In this paper, we examine the rural electrification practices in Bangladesh and evaluate the claim that, whereas they were successful up to 2005, they then began to decline in terms of their performance. This study determines the factors behind the initial success of the program as well as those that account for the recent downturn in BREP. We found that the BREP was a clear success in terms of its growth and progress; however, its performance has been declining since 2006. The key driving factors for the success of this program had to do with prioritizing system investment, community involvement, anti-corruption features, standardized practices and performance-based incentives while excluding political parties. The major issues accounting for the decline were the lack of organizational autonomy, a shortage of funding, unrealistic tariffs, and power supply shortages. Renewable-based, off-grid technologies have been successfully supplementing the on-grid program in remote areas. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 851
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacies of technological progress and renewable energy transition in amplifying national electrification rates: contextual evidence from developing countries
    Murshed, Muntasir
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2023, 81
  • [22] Rural Electrification Now and Then: Comparing Contemporary Challenges in Developing Countries to the USA ' s Experience in Retrospect
    Pellegrini, Lorenzo
    Tasciotti, Luca
    FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2013, 40 (01) : 153 - 176
  • [23] Evolving food consumption patterns of rural and urban households in developing countries A Bangladesh case
    Mottaleb, Khondoker Abdul
    Rahut, Dil Bahadur
    Kruseman, Gideon
    Erenstein, Olaf
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2018, 120 (02): : 392 - 408
  • [25] A MILP model to design hybrid wind-photovoltaic isolated rural electrification projects in developing countries
    Ferrer-Marti, L.
    Domenech, B.
    Garcia-Villoria, A.
    Pastor, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (02) : 293 - 300
  • [26] Comparison of various approaches to design wind-PV rural electrification projects in remote areas of developing countries
    Domenech, Bruno
    Ferrer-Marti, Laia
    Pastor, Rafael
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 8 (03)
  • [27] Last-mile rural electrification: Lessons learned from universalization programs in Brazil and Venezuela
    Leduchowicz-Municio, A.
    Lopez-Gozalez, A.
    Domenech, B.
    Ferrer-Marti, L.
    Udaeta, M. E. M.
    Gimenes, A. L., V
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 167
  • [28] Lessons from seven sustainability indicator programs in developing countries of Asia
    Krank, Sabrina
    Wallbaum, Holger
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (05) : 1385 - 1395
  • [29] Value chain upgrading and seafood exports: lessons from developing countries
    Tanrattanaphong, Borworn
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [30] Renewable energy education for architects: lessons from developed and developing countries
    Taleghani, Mohammad
    Ansari, Hamid R.
    Jennings, Philip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2010, 29 (02) : 105 - 115