Travel Choices and Links to Transportation Demand Management: Case Study at Ohio State University

被引:54
作者
Akar, Gulsah [1 ]
Flynn, Chris [1 ]
Namgung, Mi [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, Knowlton Sch Architecture, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Travel time;
D O I
10.3141/2319-09
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study examined the transportation choices of individuals in a large campus setting at the Ohio State University, Columbus. A web-based survey was conducted to understand the travel patterns of the campus community and to inform recommendations to reduce single-occupancy vehicle travel there. Mode choice and the most important factors that affected it were the focus of the survey. The survey included questions about respondent attitudes toward auto use and the factors that would encourage them to carpool and take transit to campus. Discrete choice models Were estimated to analyze commuter mode choices to travel to campus. The results showed that proximity to bicycle lanes and trails and bus stops increased the propensity to choose these modes. Students were more likely to travel by alternative modes than faculty and staff members. Individuals concerned about travel time, flexibility of departure time, safety, and the ability to stop on the way to and from campus were more likely to drive alone to campus. Strategies to increase the modal share of alternative modes are presented in the paper on the basis of the descriptive findings and the model results. This study's findings may be used by practitioners and campus transportation planners to understand better the factors that cause people not to choose alternative transportation modes and to evaluate transportation improvements to be considered for implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Afifi A.A., 1996, COMPUTER AIDED MULTI, V3rd
[2]   Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike [J].
Akar, Gulsah ;
Clifton, Kelly J. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2140) :165-172
[3]  
Balsas C.J. L., 2003, TRANSPORT POLICY J, V10, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00028-8
[4]  
Ben-Akiva M. E., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand, V9
[5]  
Bhattacharjee D., 1997, Transp. Policy, V4, P161
[6]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RIDESHARING INCENTIVES - DISCRETE-CHOICE MODELS OF COMMUTING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA [J].
BROWNSTONE, D ;
GOLOB, TF .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1992, 22 (01) :5-24
[7]   How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters [J].
Cao, XY ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (04) :291-302
[8]   Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal [J].
Correia, Goncalo ;
Viegas, Jose Manuel .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 45 (02) :81-90
[9]  
Dorsey Bryan., 2005, Journal of Transport Geography, V13, P235
[10]   Expected car use reduction in response to structural travel demand management measures [J].
Eriksson, Louise ;
Nordlund, Annika M. ;
Garvill, Jorgen .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 13 (05) :329-342