Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers

被引:7
作者
Liang, JT [1 ]
Lai, HS
Lee, PH
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
laparoscopic surgery; rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-005-0325-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
More and more colorectal surgeons believe that total mesorectal excision can achieve favorable oncologic results for the treatment of rectal cancers. The present study is a feasibility study aiming to evaluate if total mesorectal excision can be safely performed by laparoscopic approach with beneficial functional recovery. A total of 44 patients (from January 2004 to February 2005) with middle rectal cancer (the average distance from anal verge was 7.8 cm, ranging from 5.0 to 10.0 cm) without preoperative chemoradiation therapy were selected to undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Before the study entry, all patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or multislice spiral computed tomography to evaluate the circumferential resection margin of rectal cancer. Only patients whose circumferential resection margin was not involved by rectal cancer were considered as potentially curable by total mesorectal excision procedures and were enrolled for this study. The operation procedures were conducted according to the guidelines advocated by Heald et al.1 and were shown in the video. Posteriorly, the dissection was along the 'holy plane' downward to the level of levator ani muscle. Anteriorly, the dissection plane was at the anterior part of Denonvilliers fascia. Laterally, the lateral ligaments were sharply cauterized at the medial part. The resected bowel was reconstructed with stapled end-to-end anastomosis. The surgical outcomes of this procedure were prospectively evaluated. The laparoscopic total mesorectal excision was performed with acceptable operation time (234.4 +/- 44.4 minutes, mean +/- standard deviation) and little blood loss (80.0 +/- 24.0 ml) through a small wound (5.0 +/- 0.5 cm). Histopathology showed that all patients were able to get adequate distal section margins (mean: 2.8 cm; range: 1.6-5.4 cm) and negative circumferential resection margins (mean: 8.4mm; range: 2-14 mm). The number of dissected lymph nodes was 16.0 +/- 4.0. The pathologic tumor-node-metastasis stages were as follows: Stage I: n= 4; Stage II: n = 22; Stage III: n = 18. Two patients (4.5 percent) were diverted by protective ileostomy. There was no mortality within 30 days after operation. However, anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients. The patients have quick functional recovery, as evaluated by the length of postoperative ileus (48.0 +/- 12.0 hours), hospitalization (9.0 +/- 1.0 days) and degree of postoperative pain (3.5 +/- 0.5, visual analog scale). Besides the expenses covered by the National Bureau of Health Insurance in Taiwan, the patient had to pay an extra expense of NT$ 65000.08000.0 (1.0US dollars = 32.0 NT$). During the follow-up periods (median: 14 months, range. 2 to 27 months), three patients of Stage III and 1 patient of Stage II developed a recurrent disease (lung metastasis: n = 2; liver metastasis: n = 1, and pelvic recurrence, n = 1). By laparoscopic approach, the total mesorectal excision for rectal cancers can be safely performed with good functional recovery. However, with only a median follow-up of 14 months in this case series, the long-term oncologic outcomes for these patients remain a question. Further randomized prospective study is thus mandatory to provide solid evidence of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 518
页数:2
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer -: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature
    Bärlehner, E
    Benhidjeb, T
    Anders, S
    Schicke, B
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (06): : 757 - 766
  • [2] Beets-Tan R G H, 2003, Colorectal Dis, V5, P392, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00518.x
  • [3] THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE
    HEALD, RJ
    HUSBAND, EM
    RYALL, RDH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) : 613 - 616
  • [4] Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, 1994, GEN RUL CLIN PATH ST
  • [5] Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery - Long-term outcomes
    Leroy, J
    Jamali, F
    Forbes, L
    Smith, M
    Rubino, F
    Mutter, D
    Marescaux, J
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (02): : 281 - 289
  • [6] Reply (DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-1029-z)
    Jin-Tung Liang
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2003, 27 (12) : 1338 - 1338
  • [7] Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: Randomized controlled clinical trial
    Liang, JT
    Lai, HS
    Huang, KC
    Chang, KJ
    Shieh, MJ
    Jeng, YM
    Wang, SM
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 27 (02) : 190 - 196
  • [8] Prospective evaluation of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus laparotomy with resection for management of complex polyps of the sigmoid colon
    Liang, JT
    Shieh, MJ
    Chen, CN
    Cheng, YM
    Chang, KJ
    Wang, SM
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (03) : 377 - 383
  • [9] A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery:: A preliminary report
    Milsom, JW
    Böhm, B
    Hammerhofer, KA
    Fazio, V
    Steiger, E
    Elson, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 187 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [10] MILSOM JW, 1996, LAPAROSCOPIC COLOREC