Recommendations for the Return of Research Results to Study Participants and Guardians: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

被引:24
作者
Fernandez, Conrad V. [1 ]
Ruccione, Kathleen [3 ]
Wells, Robert J. [5 ]
Long, Jay B. [4 ]
Pelletier, Wendy [2 ]
Hooke, Mary C. [6 ]
Pentz, Rebecca D. [7 ]
Noll, Robert B. [8 ]
Baker, Justin N. [10 ]
O'Leary, Maura [11 ]
Reaman, Gregory [12 ]
Adamson, Peter C. [9 ]
Joffe, Steven [13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Izaak Walton Killam Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Alberta Childrens Prov Gen Hosp, Calgary, AB T2T 5C7, Canada
[3] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[4] Miller Childrens Hosp Long Beach, Long Beach, CA USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Sch Nursing, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[9] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[10] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[11] US FDA, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[12] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[13] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[14] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIAL; INFORMED-CONSENT; CANCER; ATTITUDES; MEDIA; ADOLESCENTS; SURVIVORS; COVERAGE; MEETINGS; PARENTS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2086
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The Children's Oncology Group (COG) strongly supports the widely recognized principle that research participants should be offered a summary of study results. The mechanism by which to do so in a cooperative research group setting has not been previously described. Methods On the basis of a review of the available empirical and theoretic literature and on iterative, multidisciplinary discussion, a COG Return of Results Task Force (RRTF) offered detailed recommendations for the return of results to research study participants. Results The RRTF established guidelines for the notification of research participants and/or their parents/guardians about the availability of research results, a mechanism for and timing of sharing results via registration on the COG public Web site, the scope of the research to be shared, the target audience, and a process for creating and vetting lay summaries of study results. The RRTF recognized the challenges in adequately conveying complex scientific results to audiences with varying levels of health literacy and recommended that particularly sensitive or complex results be returned using direct personal contact. The RRTF also recommended evaluation of the cost, effectiveness, and impact of sharing results. Conclusion These recommendations provide a framework for the offering and returning of results to participants. They can be used by individual investigators, multi-investigator research collaboratives, and large cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol 30:4573-4579. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:4573 / 4579
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, INT ETH GUID BIOM RE
  • [2] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [3] Biobanking primer: Down to basics
    Auray-Blais, Christiane
    Patenaude, Johane
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5826) : 830 - 831
  • [4] Presentation of Nonfinal Results of Randomized Controlled Trials at Major Oncology Meetings
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Le Maitre, Aurelie
    Ding, Keyue
    Farn, Kristen
    Fralick, Michael
    Phillips, Cameron
    Cescon, David W.
    Meyer, Ralph M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (24) : 3938 - 3944
  • [5] Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
    Brealey, Stephen
    Andronis, Lazaros
    Dennis, Laura
    Atwell, Christine
    Bryan, Stirling
    Coulton, Simon
    Cox, Helen
    Cross, Ben
    Fylan, Fiona
    Garratt, Andrew
    Gilbert, Fiona
    Gillan, Maureen
    Hendry, Maggie
    Hood, Kerenza
    Houston, Helen
    King, David
    Morton, Veronica
    Robling, Michael
    Russell, Ian
    Wilkinson, Clare
    [J]. TRIALS, 2010, 11
  • [6] Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers
    Bubela, TM
    Caulfield, TA
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (09) : 1399 - 1407
  • [7] Bunin GR, 1996, PEDIATRICS, V97, P486
  • [8] Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting
    Callaham, ML
    Wears, RL
    Weber, EJ
    Barton, C
    Young, G
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 254 - 257
  • [9] Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2008
    Chou, Wen-ying Sylvia
    Liu, Benmei
    Post, Samantha
    Hesse, Bradford
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2011, 5 (03) : 263 - 270
  • [10] Social Media Use in the United States: Implications for Health Communication
    Chou, Wen-ying Sylvia
    Hunt, Yvonne M.
    Beckjord, Ellen Burke
    Moser, Richard P.
    Hesse, Bradford W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (04)