Wireless Technologies and Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Findings From a Policy Research Instrument

被引:55
作者
Baker, Paul M. A. [1 ]
Moon, Nathan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Adv Commun Policy, Rehabil Engn Res Ctr Wireless Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Disability policy; Wireless technologics; Accessibility;
D O I
10.1080/10400435.2008.10131942
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The near universal deployment in the United States of a wide variety of information and communications technologies, both wired and wireless, creates potential barriers to use for several key populations, including the poor, people with disabilities, and the aging. Equal access to wireless technologies and services can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms, including legislation and regulations, market-based solutions, and awareness and outreach-based approaches. This article discusses the results of policy research conducted by the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Wireless Technologies (Wireless RERC) using policy Delphi polling methodology to probe stakeholders' opinions on key access harrier issues and to explore potential policy responses. Participants included disability advocates, disability/wireless technology policy makers, and product developers/manufacturers. Respondent input informed subsequent development of potential policy initiatives to increase access to these technologies. The findings from the Delphi suggest that awareness issues remain most important, especially manufacturer awareness of user needs and availability of consumer information for selecting the most appropriate wireless devices and services. Other key issues included the ability of people with disabilities to afford technologies and inadequacies in legislation and policy making for ensuring their general accessibility, as well as usefulness in emergencies. Technical issues, including interoperability, speech-to-text conversion, and hearing aid compatibility, were also identified by participating stakeholders as important. To address all these issues, Delphi respondents favored goals and options congruent with voluntary market-driven solutions where possible but also supported federal involvement, where necessary, to aid this process.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, TECHNOL DISABIL, DOI DOI 10.3233/TAD-2004-16106
[2]  
BAKER PMA, 2004, 26 ANN ASS PUBL POL
[3]  
BAKER PMA, 2003, INFORM TECHNOLOGY DI, V9
[4]  
CORNISH E, 1977, STUDY FUTURE
[5]   USE OF SELF-RATINGS TO IMPROVE GROUP ESTIMATES [J].
DALKEY, N ;
BROWN, B ;
COCHRAN, S .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1970, 1 (03) :283-291
[6]  
Dalkey NC, 1969, RM5888PR RAND CORP
[7]  
Linstone H. A., 2002, POLICY DELPHI TECHNI
[8]  
*REH ENG RES CTR M, 2003, FACT INFL AD WIR TEC
[9]  
TUROFF M, 1970, J TECHNOLOGICAL FORE, V2, P2