The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2

被引:47
|
作者
Middleton, Richard S. [1 ]
Yaw, Sean [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci, MS T003, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
CCS; SimCCS; Infrastructure design; Uncertainty; Stranded CO2; CARBON-DIOXIDE STORAGE; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; SYSTEM MODEL; CAPTURE; SEQUESTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; NETWORKS; PIPELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture, and storage (CCS) infrastructure will require industry-such as fossil-fuel power, ethanol production, and oil and gas extraction-to make massive investment in infrastructure. The cost of getting these investments wrong will be substantial and will impact the success of CCS technology. Multiple factors can and will impact the success of commercial-scale CCS, including significant uncertainties regarding capture, transport, and injection-storage decisions. Uncertainties throughout the CCS supply chain include policy, technology, engineering performance, economics, and market forces. In particular, large uncertainties exist for the injection and storage of CO2. Even taking into account upfront investment in site characterization, the final performance of the storage phase is largely unknown until commercial-scale injection has started. We explore and quantify the impact of getting CCS infrastructure decisions wrong based on uncertain injection rates and uncertain CO2 storage capacities using a case study managing CO2 emissions from the Canadian oil sands industry in Alberta. We use SimCCS, a widely used CCS infrastructure design framework, to develop multiple CCS infrastructure scenarios. Each scenario consists of a CCS infrastructure network that connects CO2 sources (oil sands extraction and processing) with CO2 storage reservoirs (acid gas storage reservoirs) using a dedicated CO2 pipeline network. Each scenario is analyzed under a range of uncertain storage estimates and infrastructure performance is assessed and quantified in terms of cost to build additional infrastructure to store all CO2. We also include the role of stranded CO2, CO2 that a source was expecting to but cannot capture due substandard performance in the transport and storage infrastructure. Results show that the cost of getting the original infrastructure design wrong are significant and that comprehensive planning will be required to ensure that CCS becomes a successful climate mitigation technology. In particular, we show that the concept of stranded CO2 can transform a seemingly high-performing infrastructure design into the worst case scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling of the CO2 process- and transport chain in CCS systems-Examination of transport and storage processes
    Nimtz, Michael
    Klatt, Matthias
    Wiese, Bernd
    Kuehn, Michael
    Krautz, Hans Joachim
    CHEMIE DER ERDE-GEOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 70 : 185 - 192
  • [42] CO2 transport systems development: Status of three large European CCS demonstration projects with EEPR funding
    Hetland, Jens
    Barnett, Julian
    Read, Andy
    Zapatero, Javier
    Veltin, Jeremy
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 2458 - 2466
  • [43] Transport Cost for Carbon Removal Projects With Biomass and CO2 Storage
    Stolaroff, Joshuah K.
    Pang, Simon H.
    Li, Wenqin
    Kirkendall, Whitney G.
    Goldstein, Hannah M.
    Aines, Roger D.
    Baker, Sarah E.
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [44] Scenarios and new technologies for a North-European CO2 transport infrastructure in 2050
    Lauri, Kujanpaa
    Jouko, Ritola
    Nicklas, Nordback
    Sebastian, Teir
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 2738 - 2756
  • [45] Development of EUV resists in supercritical CO2 solutions using CO2 compatible salts (CCS)
    Wagner, Mark
    DeYoung, James
    Harbinson, Chris
    ADVANCES IN RESIST TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESSING XXIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6153 : U603 - U610
  • [46] Integrated infrastructure for CO2 transport and storage in the west Mediterranean
    Boavida, D.
    Carneiro, J. F.
    Ramirez, A.
    Martinez, R.
    Czernichowski-Lauriol, I.
    Tosato, G.
    Rimi, A.
    Zarhloule, Y.
    Simoes, S.
    Cabal, H.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2440 - 2447
  • [47] Discussion of the Influence of CO and CH4 in CO2 Transport, Injection, and Storage for CCS Technology
    Blanco, Sofia T.
    Rivas, Clara
    Bravo, Ramon
    Fernandez, Javier
    Artal, Manuela
    Velasco, Inmaculada
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (18) : 10984 - 10992
  • [48] Removal of atmospheric CO2 by engineered soils in infrastructure projects
    Jorat, M. Ehsan
    Kraavi, Karl E.
    Manning, David A. C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 314
  • [49] Pipeline design for a least-cost router application for CO2 transport in the CO2 sequestration cycle
    Vandeginste, V.
    Piessens, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (04) : 571 - 581
  • [50] Optimal design of bitumen upgrading facility with CO2 reduction
    Shahandeh, Hossein
    Li, Zukui
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 106 : 106 - 121