The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2

被引:47
|
作者
Middleton, Richard S. [1 ]
Yaw, Sean [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci, MS T003, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
CCS; SimCCS; Infrastructure design; Uncertainty; Stranded CO2; CARBON-DIOXIDE STORAGE; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; SYSTEM MODEL; CAPTURE; SEQUESTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; NETWORKS; PIPELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture, and storage (CCS) infrastructure will require industry-such as fossil-fuel power, ethanol production, and oil and gas extraction-to make massive investment in infrastructure. The cost of getting these investments wrong will be substantial and will impact the success of CCS technology. Multiple factors can and will impact the success of commercial-scale CCS, including significant uncertainties regarding capture, transport, and injection-storage decisions. Uncertainties throughout the CCS supply chain include policy, technology, engineering performance, economics, and market forces. In particular, large uncertainties exist for the injection and storage of CO2. Even taking into account upfront investment in site characterization, the final performance of the storage phase is largely unknown until commercial-scale injection has started. We explore and quantify the impact of getting CCS infrastructure decisions wrong based on uncertain injection rates and uncertain CO2 storage capacities using a case study managing CO2 emissions from the Canadian oil sands industry in Alberta. We use SimCCS, a widely used CCS infrastructure design framework, to develop multiple CCS infrastructure scenarios. Each scenario consists of a CCS infrastructure network that connects CO2 sources (oil sands extraction and processing) with CO2 storage reservoirs (acid gas storage reservoirs) using a dedicated CO2 pipeline network. Each scenario is analyzed under a range of uncertain storage estimates and infrastructure performance is assessed and quantified in terms of cost to build additional infrastructure to store all CO2. We also include the role of stranded CO2, CO2 that a source was expecting to but cannot capture due substandard performance in the transport and storage infrastructure. Results show that the cost of getting the original infrastructure design wrong are significant and that comprehensive planning will be required to ensure that CCS becomes a successful climate mitigation technology. In particular, we show that the concept of stranded CO2 can transform a seemingly high-performing infrastructure design into the worst case scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corrosion of pipelines used for CO2 transport in CCS: Is it a real problem?
    Cole, Ivan S.
    Corrigan, Penny
    Sim, Samson
    Birbilis, Nick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (04) : 749 - 756
  • [32] Bio Energy with CCS (BECCS): Large potential for BioSNG at low CO2 avoidance cost
    Carbo, Michiel C.
    Smit, Ruben
    van der Drift, Bram
    Jansen, Daniel
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2950 - 2954
  • [33] Layout of CCS monitoring infrastructure with highest probability of detecting a footprint of a CO2 leak in a varying marine environment
    Hvidevold, Hilde Kristine
    Alendal, Guttorm
    Johannessen, Truls
    Ali, Alfatih
    Mannseth, Trond
    Avlesen, Helge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 37 : 274 - 279
  • [34] Enhancement of farmland greenhouse gas emissions from leakage of stored CO2: Simulation of leaked CO2 from CCS
    Zhang, Xueyan
    Ma, Xin
    Wu, Yang
    Li, Yue
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 518 : 78 - 85
  • [35] Development of a CO2 specification for a CCS hub network
    Harkin, Trent
    Filby, Ian
    Sick, Heidi
    Manderson, Dan
    Ashton, Rebecca
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6708 - 6720
  • [36] Uncertainty analyses of CO2 plume expansion subsequent to wellbore CO2 leakage into aquifers
    Hou, Zhangshuan
    Bacon, Diana H.
    Engel, Dave W.
    Lin, Guang
    Fang, Yilin
    Ren, Huiying
    Fang, Zhufeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 27 : 69 - 80
  • [37] Assessment of selected CCS technologies in electricity and synthetic fuel production for CO2 mitigation in South Africa
    Telsnig, Thomas
    Tomaschek, Jan
    Oezdemir, Enver Dora
    Bruchof, David
    Fahl, Ulrich
    Eltrop, Ludger
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 168 - 180
  • [38] Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Planning CO2 Utilization and Disposal Infrastructure Considering the Uncertainty in the CO2 Emission
    Han, Jee-Hoon
    Lee, In-Beum
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (23) : 13435 - 13443
  • [39] Possibilities for CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Colombia - case Tauramena (Casanare)
    Eliecer Marino-Martinez, Jorge
    Epimenia Moreno-Reyes, Luisa
    BOLETIN DE GEOLOGIA, 2018, 40 (01): : 109 - 122
  • [40] Multi-lateral horizontal well with dual-tubing system to improve CO2 storage security and reduce CCS cost
    Kim, Min
    Kwon, Seoyoon
    Ji, Minsoo
    Shin, Hyundon
    Min, Baehyun
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 330