The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2

被引:47
|
作者
Middleton, Richard S. [1 ]
Yaw, Sean [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci, MS T003, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
CCS; SimCCS; Infrastructure design; Uncertainty; Stranded CO2; CARBON-DIOXIDE STORAGE; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; SYSTEM MODEL; CAPTURE; SEQUESTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES; TRANSPORT; NETWORKS; PIPELINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture, and storage (CCS) infrastructure will require industry-such as fossil-fuel power, ethanol production, and oil and gas extraction-to make massive investment in infrastructure. The cost of getting these investments wrong will be substantial and will impact the success of CCS technology. Multiple factors can and will impact the success of commercial-scale CCS, including significant uncertainties regarding capture, transport, and injection-storage decisions. Uncertainties throughout the CCS supply chain include policy, technology, engineering performance, economics, and market forces. In particular, large uncertainties exist for the injection and storage of CO2. Even taking into account upfront investment in site characterization, the final performance of the storage phase is largely unknown until commercial-scale injection has started. We explore and quantify the impact of getting CCS infrastructure decisions wrong based on uncertain injection rates and uncertain CO2 storage capacities using a case study managing CO2 emissions from the Canadian oil sands industry in Alberta. We use SimCCS, a widely used CCS infrastructure design framework, to develop multiple CCS infrastructure scenarios. Each scenario consists of a CCS infrastructure network that connects CO2 sources (oil sands extraction and processing) with CO2 storage reservoirs (acid gas storage reservoirs) using a dedicated CO2 pipeline network. Each scenario is analyzed under a range of uncertain storage estimates and infrastructure performance is assessed and quantified in terms of cost to build additional infrastructure to store all CO2. We also include the role of stranded CO2, CO2 that a source was expecting to but cannot capture due substandard performance in the transport and storage infrastructure. Results show that the cost of getting the original infrastructure design wrong are significant and that comprehensive planning will be required to ensure that CCS becomes a successful climate mitigation technology. In particular, we show that the concept of stranded CO2 can transform a seemingly high-performing infrastructure design into the worst case scenario.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of Methane in CO2 Transport and Storage for CCS Technology
    Blanco, Sofia T.
    Rivas, Clara
    Fernandez, Javier
    Artal, Manuela
    Velasco, Inmaculada
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (23) : 13016 - 13023
  • [22] Facing the uncertainty of CO2 storage capacity in China by developing different storage scenarios
    Hoeller, Samuel
    Viebahn, Peter
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 89 : 64 - 73
  • [23] Cost-optimal CO2 capture and transport infrastructure-A case study of Sweden
    Karlsson, Sebastian
    Normann, Fredrik
    Johnsson, Filip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 132
  • [24] Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty
    Ampomah, W.
    Balch, R. S.
    Cather, M.
    Will, R.
    Gonda, D.
    Dai, Z.
    Soltanian, M. R.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 : 80 - 92
  • [25] European Scenarios of CO2 Infrastructure Investment
    Oei, Pao-Yu
    Mendelevitch, Roman
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 171 - 194
  • [26] Unlocking CO2 infrastructure deployment: The impact of carbon removal accounting
    Schippers, Emma Jagu
    Massol, Olivier
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 171
  • [27] Jumpstarting CCS using refinery CO2 for enhanced oil recovery
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Keating, Gordon N.
    Pawar, Rajesh J.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2185 - 2191
  • [28] On the variability of CO2 feed flows into CCS transportation and storage networks
    Spitz, T.
    Avagyan, V.
    Ascui, F.
    Bruce, A. R. W.
    Chalmers, H.
    Lucquiaud, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 74 : 296 - 311
  • [29] Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project of Japan, CO2 Injection in Process
    Tanaka, Yutaka
    Sawada, Yoshihiro
    Tanase, Daiji
    Tanaka, Jiro
    Shiomi, Susumu
    Kasukawa, Tetsuo
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 5836 - 5846
  • [30] Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS
    Gong, Wentao
    Remiezowicz, Eryk
    Fosbol, Philip Loldrup
    von Solms, Nicolas
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (16)