Quality In-Training Initiatived-A Solution to the Need for Education in Quality Improvement: Results from a Survey of Program Directors

被引:31
作者
Kelz, Rachel R. [1 ,2 ]
Sellers, Morgan M. [1 ,3 ]
Reinke, Caroline E. [1 ,2 ]
Medbery, Rachel L. [6 ]
Morris, Jon [1 ]
Ko, Clifford [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Healthcare Econ, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Amer Coll Surg, Div Res & Optimal Patient Care, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] VA Greater Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
AMERICAN-COLLEGE; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.395
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Next Accreditation System and the Clinical Learning Environment Review Program will emphasize practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice. We present the results of a survey of general surgery program directors to characterize the current state of quality improvement in graduate surgical education and introduce the Quality In-Training Initiative (QITI). STUDY DESIGN: In 2012, a 20-item survey was distributed to 118 surgical residency program directors from ACS NSQIP-affiliated hospitals. The survey content was developed in collaboration with the QITI to identify program director opinions regarding education in practice-based learning and improvement and systems-based practice, to investigate the status of quality improvement education in their respective programs, and to quantify the extent of resident participation in quality improvement. RESULTS: There was a 57% response rate. Eighty-five percent of program directors (n = 57) reported that education in quality improvement is essential to future professional work in the field of surgery. Only 28% (n = 18) of programs reported that at least 50% of their residents track and analyze their patient outcomes, compare them with norms/benchmarks/published standards, and identify opportunities to make practice improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Program directors recognize the importance of quality improvement efforts in surgical practice. Subpar participation in basic practice-based learning and improvement activities at the resident level reflects the need for support of these educational goals. The QITI will facilitate programmatic compliance with goals for quality improvement education. ((C) 2013 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, 2012, PROGR REQ GRAD MED E
  • [2] Multihospital Collaborations for Surgical Quality Improvement
    Campbell, Darrell A., Jr.
    Dellinger, E. Patchen
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (14): : 1584 - 1585
  • [3] The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals - Initial demonstration of feasibility
    Fink, AS
    Campbell, DA
    Mentzer, RM
    Henderson, WG
    Daley, J
    Bannister, J
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) : 344 - 354
  • [4] GME Commission, 2010, REP C AL INC MED, P103
  • [5] Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to Improve Surgical Outcomes
    Guillamondegui, Oscar D.
    Gunter, Oliver L.
    Hines, Leonard
    Martin, Barbara J.
    Gibson, William
    Clarke, P. Chris
    Cecil, William T.
    Cofer, Joseph B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (04) : 709 - 714
  • [6] Does Surgical Quality Improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program An Evaluation of All Participating Hospitals
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Hamilton, Barton H.
    Richards, Karen
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Cohen, Mark E.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (03) : 363 - 376
  • [7] Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
    Harris, Paul A.
    Taylor, Robert
    Thielke, Robert
    Payne, Jonathon
    Gonzalez, Nathaniel
    Conde, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) : 377 - 381
  • [8] The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP - The first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care
    Khuri, SF
    Daley, J
    Henderson, W
    Hur, K
    Demakis, J
    Aust, JB
    Chong, V
    Fabri, PJ
    Gibbs, JO
    Grover, F
    Hammermeister, K
    Irvin, G
    McDonald, G
    Passaro, E
    Phillips, L
    Scamman, F
    Spencer, J
    Stemple, JF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (04) : 491 - 504
  • [9] Leach David C, 2002, Qual Manag Health Care, V11, P39
  • [10] The Next GME Accreditation System - Rationale and Benefits
    Nasca, Thomas J.
    Philibert, Ingrid
    Brigham, Timothy
    Flynn, Timothy C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (11) : 1051 - 1056