Clinical Value of the VMI Supplemental Tests: A Modified Replication Study

Purpose. To carry out a modified replication of the study performed by Kulp and Sortor evaluating the clinical value of the information provided by Beery's visual-motor supplemental tests of Visual Perception (VP) and Motor Coordination (MC) in normally developed children. The objectives were to (a) estimate the correlations among the three tests scores; (b) assess the predictive power of the VP and MC scores in explaining the variance in Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) scores; and (c) examine whether poor performance on the VMI is related to poor performance on VP or MC. Methods. A convenience sample of 71 children ages 4 and 5 years (M = 4.62 +/- 0.43) participated in the study. Results. The supplemental tests significantly (F = 9.59; dF = 2; p <= 0.001) explained 22% of file variance in VMI performance. Only VP was significantly related to VMI (beta = 0.39; T = 3.49) accounting for the total amount of explained variance. Using the study population norms, 11 children (16% of total sample) did poorly on the VMI; of those 11, 73% did poorly on the VP, and none did poorly on the MC. None of these I I did poorly on both the VP and MC. Nine percent of total sample who did poorly on the VP performed within the norm on the VMI. Thirteen percent who performed poorly on the MC performed within the norm on the VMI. Using the VMI published norms, 14 children (20% of total sample) who did poorly on the VP performed within the norm on the VMI. Forty-eight percent who did poorly on MC performed within the norm on the VMI. Conclusions. Findings supported Kulp and sortor's conclusions that each area should be individually evaluated during visual-perceptual assessment of children regardless of performance on the VMI. (Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1007-1011)