Do You See What You Mean? Using Predictive Visualizations to Reduce Optimism in Duration Estimates

被引:6
作者
Koval, Morgane [1 ]
Jansen, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, ISIR, CNRS, Paris, France
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22) | 2022年
关键词
Planning fallacy; predictive visualization; TASK DURATION; PLANNING FALLACY; VISUAL ANALYTICS; UNCERTAINTY; TIME; PROBABILITY; MEMORY; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1145/3491102.3502010
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Making time estimates, such as how long a given task might take, frequently leads to inaccurate predictions because of an optimistic bias. Previous attempts to alleviate this bias, including decomposing the task into smaller components and listing potential surprises, have not shown any major improvement. This article builds on the premise that these procedures may have failed because they involve compound probabilities and mixture distributions which are difficult to compute in one's head. We hypothesize that predictive visualizations of such distributions would facilitate the estimation of task durations. We conducted a crowdsourced study in which 145 participants provided different estimates of overall and sub-task durations and we used these to generate predictive visualizations of the resulting mixture distributions. We compared participants' initial estimates with their updated ones and found compelling evidence that predictive visualizations encourage less optimistic estimates.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Abrahamsson P, 2002, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2349, P175
[2]   PlanningLines: Novel glyphs for representing temporal uncertainties and their evaluation [J].
Aigner, W ;
Miksch, S ;
Thurner, B ;
Biffl, S .
NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION VISUALISATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :457-463
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Cognitive biases in visualizations, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-63, 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_3]
[4]  
Arshad S Z., 2015, P ANN M AUSTR SPECIA, P352
[5]   SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY OF COMPOUND EVENTS [J].
BARHILLEL, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1973, 9 (03) :396-406
[6]   Temporal concepts and predicted duration judgments [J].
Boltz, Marilyn G. ;
Yum, Yen Na .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (06) :895-904
[7]   EXPLORING THE PLANNING FALLACY - WHY PEOPLE UNDERESTIMATE THEIR TASK COMPLETION TIMES [J].
BUEHLER, R ;
GRIFFIN, D ;
ROSS, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (03) :366-381
[8]   Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions [J].
Buehler, R ;
Griffin, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 92 (1-2) :80-90
[9]   Cognitive and motivational factors influencing time prediction [J].
Byram, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1997, 3 (03) :216-239
[10]   Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks [J].
Connolly, T ;
Dean, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (07) :1029-1045