Do concepts suffer from benign neglect in the social sciences? Elements of conceptual analysis and exploratory review of the francophone methodological literature

被引:9
作者
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc [1 ]
Jacob, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Sci Sociales, Dept Polit Sci, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
来源
SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES | 2012年 / 51卷 / 02期
关键词
concept; construct; definition; dimensions; measurement; methodology; semantics; social science practices; term;
D O I
10.1177/0539018412437107
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Concepts are essential to any scientific endeavour aimed at 'discovering' the nature of 'reality'. Yet, concepts and their analysis have received scant attention from scholars as objects worth studying and teaching in and of themselves, especially in comparison to data collection and analysis techniques. When scholars venture into analyzing concepts, they generally proceed informally, thereby raising serious concerns in terms of the validity of their findings. Conceptual analysis seems to be unrecognized and even unappreciated. This article aims to mitigate this problem. We first offer a few basic principles of conceptual analysis drawn from North American political science. After examining the nature of concepts and their importance to science, the work of Giovanni Sartori is used to establish a few rules and principles to follow when performing conceptual work. Using a sample of francophone methodological literature, we then conduct a plausibility probe of the hypothesis according to which conceptual analysis suffers from 'benign neglect'. Based on this empirical test, we conclude that while many books explicitly deal with conceptual analysis, very few do so systematically.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 204
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
Guibert J.et., 1997, Methodologie des pratiques de terrain en sciences humaines et sociales
[32]  
Guidere Mathieu, 2004, METHODOLOGIE RECHERC
[33]  
Lastrucci C.L., 1963, The scientific approach: Basic principles of the scientific method."
[34]  
Laurencelle L., 2007, ABREGE METHODES RECH
[35]  
Mace G, 2000, GUIDE ELABORATION PR
[36]  
[Mayer R. Mayer R. Ouellet F. Sain-Jean M-C. Tircotte D. et collaborateurs Mayer R. Ouellet F. Sain-Jean M-C. Tircotte D. et collaborateurs], 2000, Methodes de recherche en intervention sociale
[37]  
Moscovici S, 2003, METHODES SCI HUMAINE
[38]  
Ogien A., 1994, ENQUETE CATEGORIES D, P243
[39]  
Quivy Raymond., 2006, Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales
[40]  
Robert-Demontrond P, 2004, ANAL CONCEPTS