Comet Assay measurements: a perspective

被引:281
|
作者
Kumaravel, T. S. [1 ]
Vilhar, Barbara [2 ]
Faux, Stephen P. [1 ]
Jha, Awadhesh N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Adv Technol Cambridge Ltd, Toxicol Grp, Cambridge CB4 0WA, England
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Biol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Comet Assay; Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE); Comet Assay measurements; Image analysis; Clouds; % Tail DNA; Olive tail moment (OTM); Genetic toxicology; CELL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; DETECTING DNA-DAMAGE; HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE DNA; ALKYLATION DAMAGE; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; IN-VITRO; REPAIR; RADIATION; FISH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the 'comet' play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of 'hedgehog' or 'clouds', this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection of crosslinks with the comet assay
    Speit, G
    Merk, O
    NEOPLASMA, 1999, 46 : 76 - 78
  • [42] Application of the yeast comet assay in testing some food additives for genotoxicity by comet assay in yeast
    Rashad, Shimaa E.
    Abdel-Tawab, F. M.
    Fahmy, Eman M.
    Attalla, Ashraf G.
    Ahmed, Ekram S.
    Haggran, A. A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2021, 64 (12): : 7549 - 7567
  • [43] Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results
    Peter Møller
    Amaya Azqueta
    Elisa Boutet-Robinet
    Gudrun Koppen
    Stefano Bonassi
    Mirta Milić
    Goran Gajski
    Solange Costa
    João Paulo Teixeira
    Cristiana Costa Pereira
    Maria Dusinska
    Roger Godschalk
    Gunnar Brunborg
    Kristine B. Gutzkow
    Lisa Giovannelli
    Marcus S. Cooke
    Elke Richling
    Blanca Laffon
    Vanessa Valdiglesias
    Nursen Basaran
    Cristian Del Bo’
    Bojana Zegura
    Matjaz Novak
    Helga Stopper
    Pavel Vodicka
    Sona Vodenkova
    Vanessa Moraes de Andrade
    Monika Sramkova
    Alena Gabelova
    Andrew Collins
    Sabine A. S. Langie
    Nature Protocols, 2020, 15 : 3817 - 3826
  • [44] THE COMET MOMENT AS A MEASURE OF DNA-DAMAGE IN THE COMET ASSAY
    KENT, CRH
    EADY, JJ
    ROSS, GM
    STEEL, GG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 67 (06) : 655 - 660
  • [45] Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results
    Moller, Peter
    Azqueta, Amaya
    Boutet-Robinet, Elisa
    Koppen, Gudrun
    Bonassi, Stefano
    Milic, Mirta
    Gajski, Goran
    Costa, Solange
    Teixeira, Joao Paulo
    Costa Pereira, Cristiana
    Dusinska, Maria
    Godschalk, Roger
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    Gutzkow, Kristine B.
    Giovannelli, Lisa
    Cooke, Marcus S.
    Richling, Elke
    Laffon, Blanca
    Valdiglesias, Vanessa
    Basaran, Nursen
    Del Bo', Cristian
    Zegura, Bojana
    Novak, Matjaz
    Stopper, Helga
    Vodicka, Pavel
    Vodenkova, Sona
    de Andrade, Vanessa Moraes
    Sramkova, Monika
    Gabelova, Alena
    Collins, Andrew
    Langie, Sabine A. S.
    NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2020, 15 (12) : 3817 - 3826
  • [46] Application of the comet assay method in clinical studiesAnwendung der "Comet Assay" Methode in klinischen Studien
    Petra Fikrová
    Rudolf Štětina
    Miloslav Hronek
    Radek Hyšpler
    Alena Tichá
    Zdeněk Zadák
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2011, 123 : 693 - 699
  • [47] Open Comet: An automated tool for comet assay image analysis
    Gyori, Benjamin M.
    Venkatachalam, Gireedhar
    Thiagarajan, P. S.
    Hsu, David
    Clement, Marie-Veronique
    REDOX BIOLOGY, 2014, 2 : 457 - 465
  • [48] The next three decades of the comet assay: a report of the 11th International Comet Assay Workshop
    Koppen, Gudrun
    Azqueta, Amaya
    Pourrut, Bertrand
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    Collins, Andrew R.
    Langie, Sabine A. S.
    MUTAGENESIS, 2017, 32 (03) : 397 - 408
  • [49] Deep learning method for comet segmentation and comet assay image analysis
    Yiyu Hong
    Hyo-Jeong Han
    Hannah Lee
    Donghwan Lee
    Junsu Ko
    Zhen-yu Hong
    Ji-Young Lee
    Ju-Hyung Seok
    Hee Seon Lim
    Woo-Chan Son
    Insuk Sohn
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [50] Deep learning method for comet segmentation and comet assay image analysis
    Hong, Yiyu
    Han, Hyo-Jeong
    Lee, Hannah
    Lee, Donghwan
    Ko, Junsu
    Hong, Zhen-yu
    Lee, Ji-Young
    Seok, Ju-Hyung
    Lim, Hee Seon
    Son, Woo-Chan
    Sohn, Insuk
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)