Comet Assay measurements: a perspective

被引:281
|
作者
Kumaravel, T. S. [1 ]
Vilhar, Barbara [2 ]
Faux, Stephen P. [1 ]
Jha, Awadhesh N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Adv Technol Cambridge Ltd, Toxicol Grp, Cambridge CB4 0WA, England
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Biol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Comet Assay; Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE); Comet Assay measurements; Image analysis; Clouds; % Tail DNA; Olive tail moment (OTM); Genetic toxicology; CELL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; DETECTING DNA-DAMAGE; HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE DNA; ALKYLATION DAMAGE; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; IN-VITRO; REPAIR; RADIATION; FISH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the 'comet' play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of 'hedgehog' or 'clouds', this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The International Comet Assay Workshop
    Anderson, D
    Plewa, MJ
    MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 13 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [22] Controlling variation in the comet assay
    Collins, Andrew R.
    El Yamani, Naouale
    Lorenzo, Yolanda
    Shaposhnikov, Sergey
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    Azqueta, Amaya
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2014, 5
  • [23] The comet assay in nanotoxicology research
    Hanna L. Karlsson
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010, 398 : 651 - 666
  • [24] Comet assay in neonatal sepsis
    Natália C. Carvalho
    Rozilda L. de Souza
    Felipe Dal-Pizzol
    Vanessa Moraes de Andrade
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2010, 77 : 875 - 877
  • [25] The Liverbeads® as a tool for the comet assay
    Vian, L
    Yusuf, AT
    Guyomard, C
    Cano, JP
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2002, 519 (1-2) : 163 - 170
  • [26] The Comet Assay: Breaking with Tradition
    Vasquez, M. Z.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2009, 50 (07) : 579 - 579
  • [27] The comet assay: a heavenly method!
    Collins, Andrew R.
    MUTAGENESIS, 2015, 30 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [28] The comet assay in nanotoxicology research
    Karlsson, Hanna L.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 398 (02) : 651 - 666
  • [29] Automated comet assay analysis
    Böcker, W
    Rolf, W
    Bauch, T
    Müller, WU
    Streffer, C
    CYTOMETRY, 1999, 35 (02): : 134 - 144
  • [30] Comet assay: A brief history
    Piperakis, S. M.
    CELL BIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 25 (01) : 1 - 3