Comet Assay measurements: a perspective

被引:281
|
作者
Kumaravel, T. S. [1 ]
Vilhar, Barbara [2 ]
Faux, Stephen P. [1 ]
Jha, Awadhesh N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Adv Technol Cambridge Ltd, Toxicol Grp, Cambridge CB4 0WA, England
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Biol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Comet Assay; Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE); Comet Assay measurements; Image analysis; Clouds; % Tail DNA; Olive tail moment (OTM); Genetic toxicology; CELL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; DETECTING DNA-DAMAGE; HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE DNA; ALKYLATION DAMAGE; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; IN-VITRO; REPAIR; RADIATION; FISH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the 'comet' play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of 'hedgehog' or 'clouds', this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Antioxidants and the Comet assay
    Cemeli, Eduardo
    Baumgartner, Adolf
    Anderson, Diana
    MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2009, 681 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [12] Measurements using the alkaline comet assay predict bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity
    Moneef, MAL
    Sherwood, BT
    Bowman, KJ
    Kockelbergh, RC
    Symonds, RP
    Steward, WP
    Mellon, JK
    Jones, GDD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (12) : 2271 - 2276
  • [13] ACELLULAR COMET ASSAY: A TOOL FOR ASSESSING VARIABLES INFLUENCING THE ALKALINE COMET ASSAY
    Kennedy, Erin K.
    McNamee, James P.
    Lalonde, Louise Prud'homme
    Jones, Trevor
    Wilkinson, Diana
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 148 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [14] Recent applications of the Comet Assay: A report from the International Comet Assay Workshop 2019
    Gajski, Goran
    Langie, Sabine
    Zhanataev, Aliy
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 333 : 1 - 3
  • [15] Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals
    Kumaravel, T. S.
    Jha, Awadhesh N.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2006, 605 (1-2) : 7 - 16
  • [16] Reference cells in the comet assay
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2019, 845
  • [17] The comet assay: topical issues
    Collins, Andrew R.
    Oscoz, Amaia Azqueta
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    Gaivao, Isabel
    Giovannelli, Lisa
    Kruszewski, Marcin
    Smith, Catherine C.
    Stetina, Rudolf
    MUTAGENESIS, 2008, 23 (03) : 143 - 151
  • [18] THE COMET ASSAY - A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
    FAIRBAIRN, DW
    OLIVE, PL
    ONEILL, KL
    MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN GENETIC TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 339 (01): : 37 - 59
  • [19] Flash-comet assay
    Bivehed, Erik
    Hellman, Bjorn
    METHODSX, 2020, 7
  • [20] The Comet Assay: Some Considerations
    Collins, AR
    NEOPLASMA, 1999, 46 : 3 - 5