Comet Assay measurements: a perspective

被引:281
|
作者
Kumaravel, T. S. [1 ]
Vilhar, Barbara [2 ]
Faux, Stephen P. [1 ]
Jha, Awadhesh N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Adv Technol Cambridge Ltd, Toxicol Grp, Cambridge CB4 0WA, England
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Biol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
Comet Assay; Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE); Comet Assay measurements; Image analysis; Clouds; % Tail DNA; Olive tail moment (OTM); Genetic toxicology; CELL GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; DETECTING DNA-DAMAGE; HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE DNA; ALKYLATION DAMAGE; MAMMALIAN-CELLS; IN-VITRO; REPAIR; RADIATION; FISH; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10565-007-9043-9
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The Comet Assay or single cell gel electrophoresis assay is one of the very widely used assays to microscopically detect DNA damage at the level of a single cell. The determination of damage is carried out either through visual scoring of cells (after classification into different categories on the basis of tail length and shape) or by using different commercially available or public domain software (which automatically recognise the extent of damage). In this assay, the shape, size and amount of DNA within the 'comet' play important roles in the determination of the level of damage. The use of a software in particular also provides a range of different parameters, many of which might not be relevant in determining the extent of DNA damage. As a large number of factors could influence the shape, size, identification and determination of induced damage, which includes the scoring criteria, staining techniques, selection of parameters (whilst using the software packages) and appearance of 'hedgehog' or 'clouds', this article aims (a) to provide an overview of evolution of measurements of DNA damage using the Comet Assay and (b) to summarise and critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches currently being adopted whilst using this assay. It is suggested that judicious selection of different parameters, staining methods along with inter-laboratory validation and harmonisation of methodologies will further help in making this assay more robust and widely acceptable for scientific as well as regulatory studies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comet Assay measurements: a perspective
    T. S. Kumaravel
    Barbara Vilhar
    Stephen P. Faux
    Awadhesh N. Jha
    Cell Biology and Toxicology, 2009, 25 : 53 - 64
  • [2] Image analysis of comet assay measurements
    Bocker, W
    Bauch, T
    Muller, WU
    Streffer, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 72 (04) : 449 - 460
  • [3] Validation of raw data measurements in the comet assay
    Duez, P
    Dehon, G
    Dubois, J
    TALANTA, 2004, 63 (04) : 879 - 886
  • [4] Application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring: An hCOMET perspective
    Azqueta, Amaya
    Ladeira, Carina
    Giovannelli, Lisa
    Boutet-Robinet, Elisa
    Bonassi, Stefano
    Neri, Monica
    Gajski, Goran
    Duthie, Susan
    Del Bo, Cristian
    Riso, Patrizia
    Koppen, Gudrun
    Basaran, Nursen
    Collins, Andrew
    Moller, Peter
    MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2020, 783
  • [5] New Application of the Comet Assay: Chromosome-Comet Assay
    Cortes-Gutierrez, Elva I.
    Davila-Rodriguez, Martha I.
    Luis Fernandez, Jose
    Lopez-Fernandez, Carmen
    Gosalbez, Altea
    Gosalvez, Jaime
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 59 (07) : 655 - 660
  • [6] Comet assay revisited
    Brunborg, Gunnar
    Collins, Andrew C.
    Gutzkow, Kristine B.
    MUTAGENESIS, 2009, 24 (01) : 107 - 107
  • [7] DNA-repair measurements by use of the modified comet assay: An inter-laboratory comparison within the European Comet Assay Validation Group (ECVAG)
    Godschalk, Roger W. L.
    Ersson, Clara
    Riso, Patrizia
    Porrini, Marisa
    Langie, Sabine A. S.
    van Schooten, Frederik-Jan
    Azqueta, Amaya
    Collins, Andrew R.
    Jones, George D. D.
    Kwok, Rachel W. L.
    Phillips, David H.
    Sozeri, Osman
    Allione, Alessandra
    Matullo, Giuseppe
    Moller, Lennart
    Forchhammer, Lykke
    Loft, Steffen
    Moller, Peter
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2013, 757 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [8] Modelling the comet assay
    McArt, Darragh G.
    McKerr, George
    Howard, C. Vyvyan
    Saetzler, Kurt
    Wasson, Gillian R.
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2009, 37 : 914 - 917
  • [9] Measurements using the alkaline comet assay predict bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity
    M A L Moneef
    B T Sherwood
    K J Bowman
    R C Kockelbergh
    R P Symonds
    W P Steward
    J K Mellon
    G D D Jones
    British Journal of Cancer, 2003, 89 : 2271 - 2276
  • [10] Comet assay and hormesis
    Calabrese, Edward J.
    Selby, Paul B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 341