A 3-year follow-up after anterior colporrhaphy compared with collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial

被引:36
作者
Rudnicki, M. [1 ]
Laurikainen, E. [2 ]
Pogosean, R. [3 ]
Kinne, I. [4 ]
Jakobsson, U. [5 ]
Teleman, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[3] Lidkoping Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lidkoping, Sweden
[4] Ahus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ahus, Norway
[5] Lund Univ, Fac Med, Ctr Primary Healthcare Res, Lund, Sweden
[6] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Anterior colporrhaphy; erosion; pelvic organ prolapse; synthetic mesh; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; REPAIR; COMPLICATIONS; CYSTOCELE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; PFDI-20; WOMEN; KIT;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.13628
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the 1-year (previously published) and 3-year objective and subjective cure rates, and complications, related to the use of a collagen-coated transvaginal mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse against a conventional anterior repair. DesignRandomised controlled study. SettingSix departments of obstetrics and gynaecology in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. PopulationA total of 138 women, of 55 years of age or older, admitted for stage 2 anterior vaginal wall prolapse. MethodsThe women scheduled for primary anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery were randomised between conventional anterior colporrhaphy and surgery with a collagen-coated prolene mesh. All patients were evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) assessment before and after surgery. Symptoms related to pelvic organ prolapse were evaluated using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Main outcome measuresObjective cure, defined as POP-Q stage <2 prolapse at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Furthermore, mesh exposure and dyspareunia were also recorded. ResultsIn total, 138 patients (70 from the mesh group versus 68 from the conventional anterior colporrhaphy group) out of 160 (86.3%) participated in the 3-year follow-up. POP-Q revealed an objective anatomic cure for 88.1 and 91.4%, respectively, in the mesh group at the 1- and 3-year follow-ups, compared with 39.9 and 41.2% in the colporrhaphy group. No difference between the groups was observed regarding PFIQ-7, PFDI-20, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) scores. The number of mesh exposures did not change during the study period and all exposures were minor. ConclusionOur study demonstrates that although the objective outcome was superior in the mesh group, the use of mesh had no impact on the subjective outcome. Tweetable abstractPOP-Q deteriorates after anterior prolapse surgery but remains stable in women with mesh implantation. Tweetable abstract POP-Q deteriorates after anterior prolapse surgery but remains stable in women with mesh implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 142
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study [J].
Abbott, Sara ;
Unger, Cecile A. ;
Evans, Janelle M. ;
Jallad, Karl ;
Mishra, Kevita ;
Karram, Mickey M. ;
Iglesia, Cheryl B. ;
Rardin, Charles R. ;
Barber, Matthew D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (02) :163.e1-163.e8
[2]   Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair [J].
Altman, Daniel ;
Falconer, Christian .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02) :303-308
[3]   Anterior Colporrhaphy versus Transvaginal Mesh for Pelvic-Organ Prolapse [J].
Altman, Daniel ;
Vayrynen, Tapio ;
Engh, Marie Ellstrom ;
Axelsen, Susanne ;
Falconer, Christian .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (19) :1826-1836
[4]  
[Anonymous], FDA SAF COMM UPD SER
[5]   Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, MD ;
Lambers, AR ;
Visco, AG ;
Bump, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) :18-22
[6]   Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) [J].
Barber, MD ;
Walters, MD ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :103-113
[7]   Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment [J].
Brandao da Silveira, Simone dos Reis ;
Haddad, Jorge Milhem ;
Katalin de Jarmy-Di Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona ;
Nastri, Fernanda ;
Markos Kawabata, Miriam Goncalves ;
Carramao, Silvia da Silva ;
Rodrigues, Claudinei Alves ;
Baracat, Edmund Chada ;
Flores Auge, Antonio Pedro .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (03) :335-342
[8]   Long-term treatment outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery versus anteriorposterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Cao, Qi ;
Chen, Yi-Song ;
Ding, Jing-Xin ;
Hu, Chang-Dong ;
Feng, Wei-Wei ;
Hu, Wei-Guo ;
Hua, Ke-Qin .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 53 (01) :79-85
[9]   Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Carey, M. ;
Higgs, P. ;
Goh, J. ;
Lim, J. ;
Leong, A. ;
Krause, H. ;
Cornish, A. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (10) :1380-1386
[10]   Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse [J].
Chen, Luyun ;
Ashton-Miller, James A. ;
Hsu, Yvonne ;
DeLancey, John O. L. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02) :324-332