What are the acceptances and associated influences of hospice care in Mainland China? A national cross-sectional study

被引:14
作者
Zhang, Xinyue [1 ]
Zhang, Xun [2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiqi [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Tianle [4 ]
Siow, Lixuen [1 ]
Ye, Xinxin [5 ]
Wang, Yinlin [1 ]
Wang, Yujia [6 ]
Ming, Wai-Kit [7 ]
Sun, Xinying [8 ]
Xiang, Ze [3 ]
Wu, Yibo [8 ]
Wu, Jian [9 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Zhejiang Univ Med, Stomatol Hosp, Zhejiang Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Key Lab Oral B, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Chu Kochen Honors Coll Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Harbin Med Univ, Coll Humanities & Social Sci, Harbin, Peoples R China
[7] City Univ Hong Kong, Jockey Club Coll Vet Med & Life Sci, Dept Infect Dis & Publ Hlth, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[8] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social Med & Hlth Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
hospice care; personal intention; affecting factors; cross-sectional study; China; public education; OF-LIFE CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; GOOD DEATH; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.985218
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundChina ranks 53(rd) out of 81 countries in the Quality of Death Index for 2021. Although hospice care demand is increasing, the progress remains slow. It is of great significance to explore the acceptances and associated influencing factors of hospice care. MethodsA cross-sectional survey by quota sampling was conducted in China from July 10(th) to September 15(th), 2021. We collected demographic data and hospice care acceptance. A stepwise linear regression analysis was used. ResultsThis survey contained 11,031 valid questionnaire results to investigate the hospice care acceptance. It was found that individuals with undergraduate or above (beta = 0.04), more properties [2 (beta = 0.02), 3 (beta = 0.01)], and higher reimbursement types of medical insurance [employee health insurance and commercial health (beta = 0.03), government insurance (beta = 0.04)] had higher hospice acceptance willingness, while males (beta = -0.02) were less willing to accept than females. Psychological conditions [mild anxiety (beta = 0.03), moderate anxiety (beta = 0.01), moderate stress (beta = 0.05), and severe stress (beta = 0.06)] also played an important role. The Self-Management Scale (SHMS) (beta = 0.12), EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) (beta = 0.05), EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) (beta = 0.21), Short-Form Family Health Scale (FHS-SF) (beta = 0.12), higher scores of the Short-Form Health Literacy Instrument (HLS-SF12) (beta = 0.16), and Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) (beta = 0.10) also contributed. Gender subgroup showed that in the male group, age, highest educational level, marital status, number of properties, whether having children, psychological conditions, the SHMS, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, HLS-SF12, and PSSS showed significant difference. Urban and rural subgroups showed that age, highest educational level, number of properties, whether having chronic disease or psychological conditions, the SHMS, EQ-VAS, HLS-SF12, and PSSS were contributing factors in rural areas. ConclusionThe average score of acceptance of hospice care was 65.02 points. Gender, house, anxiety, pressure, social support, and health literacy were the main influencing factors on residents' attitudes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Hope of Recovery in Patients in the Terminal Phase of Cancer under Palliative and Hospice Care in Poland [J].
Baczewska, Bozena ;
Block, Boguslaw ;
Kropornicka, Beata ;
Niedzielski, Antoni ;
Malm, Maria ;
Lukasiewicz, Jacek ;
Wojciechowska, Krystyna ;
Poleszak, Wieslaw ;
Zwolak, Agnieszka ;
Makara-Studzinska, Marta .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
[2]   SOCIAL SUPPORT, TYPE-A BEHAVIOR, AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
BLUMENTHAL, JA ;
BURG, MM ;
BAREFOOT, J ;
WILLIAMS, RB ;
HANEY, T ;
ZIMET, G .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1987, 49 (04) :331-340
[3]   Understanding Palliative Care and Hospice: A Review for Primary Care Providers [J].
Buss, Mary K. ;
Rock, Laura K. ;
McCarthy, Ellen P. .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 92 (02) :280-286
[4]   Priorities and challenges for a palliative approach to care for rural indigenous populations: A scoping review [J].
Caxaj, C. Susana ;
Schill, Kaela ;
Janke, Robert .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2018, 26 (03) :e329-e336
[5]   What influences the willingness of cancer patients to receive hospice palliative care at end of life? [J].
Chen, Ting-Ru ;
Hu, Wen-Yu ;
Two, Shiow-Ni ;
Chiu, Tai-Yuan .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 49 (04) :361-366
[6]  
Chen XW, 2019, J RURAL HEALTH, V35, P405, DOI [10.1111/jrh.12335, 10.1017/S0373463318000504]
[7]   Knowledge, attitudes and preferences of palliative and end-of-life care among patients with cancer in mainland China: a cross-sectional study [J].
Cheng, Qinqin ;
Duan, Yinglong ;
Zheng, Hongling ;
Xu, Xianghua ;
Khan, Khalid ;
Xie, Jianfei ;
Chen, Yongyi .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09)
[8]   The Family Health Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Short- and Long-Form [J].
Crandall, AliceAnn ;
Weiss-Laxer, Nomi S. ;
Broadbent, Eliza ;
Holmes, Erin Kramer ;
Magnusson, Brianna Michele ;
Okano, Lauren ;
Berge, Jerica M. ;
Barnes, Michael D. ;
Hanson, Carl Lee ;
Jones, Blake L. ;
Novilla, Len B. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
[9]   Missed opportunities during family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit [J].
Curtis, JR ;
Engelberg, RA ;
Wenrich, MD ;
Shannon, SE ;
Treece, PD ;
Rubenfeld, GD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 171 (08) :844-849
[10]  
Duong Tuyen V, 2019, Health Lit Res Pract, V3, pe91, DOI 10.3928/24748307-20190225-01